Who's Governing Your Mental

All the time I hear my people saying "were not from America, we were brought over here on cargo slave ships", but yet the Roman Catholic Church doesn't believe that at all, you know why, cause since the Council of Carthage in 397 AD to 1420, they were arresting and murdering other European sects who had original manuscripts that gave archaeological proof that the continents were once connected. Wait let me guess, they didn't tell you that in his story or schools did they? But yet they made sure that they left Genesis 11 in there to inform you that the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech, but yet don't tell you how they had to reconstruct the book of Jasher and take it out the bible because it bare record of the continents all being one super continent containing inhabitants that where of one language. Of course they didn't tell you, neither do they mention that these cover-ups exist today because they started The Smithsonian Institution back in 1829 "for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men".

They don't tell you that this institution is a independent federal agency, that has been actively suppressing some of the most interesting and important archaeological discoveries made in the Americas, and do you know what one of those discoveries was? Blacks being here before any race ever existed and are the true aboriginals of what is known today as America. See they want you to believe you didn't exist in America until Columbus came along, then when you out smarted them and identified their deception, they then wanted you to believe you didn't exist in America until 1619 in Jamestown Virginia. But what they will not tell you, is that you existed in America before the Native Americans and Europeans and any race period, you are the aboriginals of this land, you were here before slavery with some of the finest civilizations ever known on the face of this earth. They don't want you to know that, the current continents are a result of the break up of Pangaea which was fragmented into several pieces, with each being part of a mobile plate of the lithosphere. From these pieces do you have the current continents that you see today.

If you look at a map of the world, you can easily see the eastern coast of South America neatly fits into the western coast of Africa, thus by these two as being one, resulting in creating the southern portion of the Appalachian Mountains, and the Meseta Mountains. Further study of Pangaea is found in the geology of adjacent continents, showing that the eastern coast of South America and the western coast of Africa, had matching geological trends. Also, the rifting that took place between North America and Africa produced multiple failed rifts, in which one rift resulted in a new ocean, known as the North Atlantic Ocean. So now you can understand how come it was so easy for America to makes slaves, because Africa and America were once together, thus showing blacks were already here in America, thus proving the theory of blacks coming over only slave-ships as being the reason of how they ended up in America, as being false.

Understand that the second major phase in the break-up of Pangaea began in the Early Cretaceous (150–140 Ma), when the minor super-continent of Gondwana separated into multiple continents (Africa, South America, India, Antarctica, and Australia). So as you can further see, they were once together before the rifting and breakup, and when they finally separated from eastern Gondwana (Antarctica, India and Australia), they caused the opening of a "South Indian Ocean". In the Middle Cretaceous, Gondwana fragmented to open up the South Atlantic Ocean as South America started to move westward away from Africa. So now knowing that South America and America were once together, one can begin to understand how come Tarzan was in the jungle with Africans, yet swinging along the Amazon River, which is located in South America. Now we also know why the Olmec heads (unequivocally African features), were dug up in South America, thus furthering proving that the theory of blacks coming over here only by way of cargo slave ships, as being a complete lie.

Why don't they tell you this? Out of all these videos of curses and North Atlantic Slave Trade hype, why haven't they gotten around in this Hebrew Cult Movement to give you real history instead of that Shaggy and Scooby Do mystery doctrine? Why don't they tell you that from Pangaea's northern half called Laurasia, is how you got your modern day North America, Europe, and two thirds of Asia? Why don't they tell you that from Pangaea's southern half called Gondwanaland, is how you got South America, Africa (which included most of the middle East, Southern Asia, Antarctica, Australia, and New Guinea? You didn't know the oceans were united did you, nor did you know the Atlantic ocean never existed, but yet when they speak of the North Atlantic Slave Trade they magically never bring that up. A few extensions of the world ocean reached into the Pangaea landmass, in which we now call them the Arctic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and the Mediterranean Sea.

Why are you not told that, the union of the African/Middle Eastern plate with north Asian plate, for example, created the Caucasus Mountains, and closed off the eastern (main) outlet of the Mediterranean Sea? These camps never get this detailed because then they would have to tell you, that blacks were in the Caucasus Mountains before who they call "the white man". The most dramatic impact took place when India, weighing an estimated 45 quintillion pounds (45 followed by 18 zeroes), slammed into the Asian landmass, thus this raised up the Himalaya Mountains and the Tibetan plateau. The last movement on a continental scale was the creation of the Great Rift Valley, in which the destroyed cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were in the valley, and according to Genesis 13, at one time the land around them was richer than what one sees there today.

The northern part, beginning in Lebanon, broke Arabia from Africa and created the Jordan valley, the Dead Sea, the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, in which it also reduced contact between Africa and the Middle East to the Isthmus of Suez. The second part comes ashore in a desolate part of Ethiopia called the Danakil depression, and runs southwest through the middle of the Abyssinian massif, and turns due south at the Ethiopia-Kenya border, passes Lake Victoria on its eastern side, and finally peters out in Tanzania. The third, southernmost part of the rift valley is separate from the others, in which it runs north from Lake Nyasa but veers west before it gets to Lake Victoria and ends up in Uganda. If the central and southern rifts hadn't missed each other by going around Lake Victoria on opposite sides, all of East Africa from Somalia to Mozambique might now be floating in the Indian Ocean (the lost continent of Lemuria!).

You do know that this was known back in 1596 by the Dutch map maker Abraham Ortelius, and in 1858 by geographer Antonio Snider-Pellegrini right? They ask you today on key chains and bracelets, what was Jesus do, but what they should be asking you is, what would you do if you were trying to use technology to recreate a one world order that traces back to the Tower of Babel to unite the whole earth back as one if your a Roman Catholic Ranking file elitest? You would do exactly what they did at their councils, locate and burn all manuscripts showing how this super continent existed before the flood, that way your pen can control the understanding the world would have of history, and thus would by you time to hire archaeologist to create for you, artifacts and evidence to support your account of his story that you would like to convey to the people.

You have been educated to be indoctrinated for a perpetual assault of systematic dehumanization, thus do you stand today as merely etch a sketch images without a nationality because you have been severed from the Family of Nations. You were Coloreds in the 40s, Negroes in the 50s, Blacks in the 60s, Afro in the 70s, Afro Americans, Nubians, Bilalians, plus Blacks in the 80s, reduced to African Americans in the 90s, then became Afro Centric People, with your latest census in 2010 showing your still slaves, by having Negro as a selection for you. The 14th Amendment along with your Birth Certificate sanctioned by a State Seal, legalized you as a slave, but yet you thought slavery was over, no, its just modernized. Take a look at your driver's license and see the European family last name on their before what you think is your first name, and you'll see your Emancipation. The Emancipation Proclamation dealt with the transferring of the slaves from Corporate Families, to the Corporate State, it never freed you.

It was merely a document of transfer of responsibility for the property, known as slaves. Such terms you are refered to by were created to identify a people that are nation-less, thus upon the 14th Amendment creation, which says "States shall uphold the "privileges and immunities" of United States citizens, you weren't given any rights. United States citizens subject to the government, do not have a constitution or inalienable rights, cause property (artificial persons) can only have civil rights, privileges and immunities granted by the government. So in all actuality, what they did was upgrade you a little bit from property (slaves), to having the privilege of being a citizen/subject of the United States government. This is how come they laugh when you ask for Reparations, cause they know since 1868, that upon the creation of the 14th Amendment, it has declared Reparations to "All persons subject to its jurisdiction" as unconstitutional. So now you see why all those marches our people done with all that education aka indoctrination, was to no effect towards reparations. So ask yourself, how does the law define reparations?

REPARATION: (Black’s Law Dictionary / 6th Edition)

Payment for an injury or damage; redress for a wrong done. Several States have adopted the Uniform Crime Victims Reparation Act. Certain Federal statutes also provide for reparations for violation of Act; e.g. persons suffering losses because of violations of Commodity Futures Trading Act may seek reparation under the Act against violator. 7 U.S.C.A. #18. Payment made by one country to another for damages during war or breach of an international obligation. See: Restitution."

So according to the above definition and legal application, Reparation is a form of payment or restitution that is rendered between Countries, Established Governments and Nations as an act of comity for injuries or damages suffered during wrong doings or war. Notice the word "international" and its root word being "nation", then you can begin to understand that Europeans who designed the Negro did so intentionally for them to be their slaves to never become a nation. So your made in the molds of perpetual slavery, therefore you are not and can never be a "Country, Established Government, or Nation", which is by law what you must be in order to receive Reparations. So they have you as an African American, which really means you are Assumable Jurisdiction of the United States, so don't be deceived by all these individuals and groups and activists fighting for reparations they can never have in their present status. You must have one free national name, which goes to show you that if your camp leaders and so called Hebrew Israelite groups are really proving that your Israel the chosen people, then how come you only a free name on facebook as being Israel but yet no worthy proof that you are Israel to declare you legally as a nation? The Indians, Jewish, Japanese, Eskimos all got their reparations and national status, and what you got, a few barber shops and rims and audio systems and fashion and music and Sunday church service and the club, and a education, wow, don't you feel liberated?

They will never tell you that those whom you see living in the Olmec heartland today, were not there 3000 years ago, though they would want you to believe that. The scientific evidence supports the African origin and perpetuation of an Olmec civilization in Mesoamerica from 1200 BC, up to around 400 AD. Thus do they not bring this up, cause they want you to believe you first came over in 1619, so therefore you can't claim the land mass that makes up the Americas as being yours. What you need to know is that, the Olmec people were Africans, thus proven by the African scripts found during archaeological excavation. The Malinke-Bambara origin of the Mayan term for writing proves this, the cognate iconographic representations of African and Olmec personages, the influence of Malinke-Bambara cultural and linguistic features on historic Mesoamerican populations, and the presence of African skeletal material excavated from Olmec graves in addition to many other variables that prove this, and explain the African origin of the Olmecs. So now knowing that Africa and America were once together, you now know you are actually indigenous to America, and all that go back to Africa talk, is bull dookie you were here before any race. This also goes to show you the lack of historical knowledge and research depth that these so called Hebrew Israelites have, which further shows you their understanding is very weak, and that all who teach that 1619 doctrine, are false and still deceived.

So in addition to Wiercinski’ analysis of the Olmec skeletons, you had many other researchers such as C.C. Marquez with his work "Estudios arqueologicos y ethnografico (Madrid,1920)", you also had Roland B. Dixon with his work "The racial history of Man (N.Y.,1923)", you also had Ernest Hooton with his work "Up from the Ape (N.Y.,1931)", you also have the Luzia remains which make it clear that Africans were in the Americas before the native Americans crossed the Bearing Sea. This totally destroys the Hebrew Israelite doctrine of the North American Indians being the ten tribes that were carried away by the King of Assyria, and later came to the America's before the so called blacks of Judah. There is skeletal evidence of Africans in Olmecland that were similar to the West African type black, in which Constance Irwin and Dr. Wiercinski have both reported that skeletal remains of Africans have been found in Mexico. Constance Irwin, in Fair Gods and Stone Faces, says that anthropologist see "distinct signs of Negroid ancestry in many a New World skull...."

These slanted eyed people you see my brothers and sisters were the Original Chinese people, yes Chinese people. Today in America they would be called African Americans, scholars have managed to distort a lot ancient artifacts to hide this knowledge from the masses of people. Put down the satanic books of Zane and get some history books - Sex & Race by J.A Rodgers and be who the Most High set us up to be. Shalom

Also affinities were found between African and ancient Chinese populations, in which is a known fact that many Negro/African /Oceanic skeletons (referred to as Loponoid by the Polish school) have been found in ancient China, for further proof research (Kwang-chih Chang The Archaeology of ancient China (1976,1977, p.76,1987, pp.64,68). Then you will learn that these black people were spread throughout Kwangsi, Kwantung, Szechwan, Yunnan and Pearl River delta. Which also in the book entitled "Sex and Race", you'll also find that the first Chinese were also black, and further study will show you also that skeletons from Liu-Chiang and Dawenkou, which were early Neolithic sites found in China, were also Negro. Moreover, the Dawenkou skeletons show skull deformation and extraction of teeth customs, in kinship to the customs among Blacks in Polynesia and Africa. Archaeological evidence supports the view that the Olmec were predominately African when we examine the anthropological language used to describe the Olmec skeletons, and also the genetic evidence supports the skeletal evidence that Africans have been in Mexico for thousands of years, thus further showing we are aboriginals to the land mass that makes up America, which is why we are the only people blocked from receiving reparations.

Did you know that the Maya language illustrates a Mande substratum, in addition to African genetic markers? James l. Gutherie (2000) in a study of the HLAs in indigenous American populations, found that the Vantigen of the Rhesus system, considered to be an indication of African ancestry, among Indians in Belize and Mexico centers of Mayan civilization. Did you know that the Otomi, a Mexican group identified as being of African origin and six Mayan groups show the B Allele of the ABO system that is considered to be of African origin? See this is why the Smithsonian Institution, will never tell you that according to research done back in 2000, the researchers claim that as many as seventy-five percent of Mexicans have an African heritage. Cuevas in 2004, made the statement saying "these Africans have been erased from history", which is why the admixture of Africans and Mexicans make it impossible to compare pictures of contemporary Mexicans and the Olmec. Due to the fact that 75% of the contemporary Mexicans have African genes you find that many of them look similar to the Olmecs.

In a discussion of the Mexican and African admixture in Mexico Lisker et al (1996) noted that the East Coast of Mexico had extensive admixture. The following percentages of African ancestry were found among East coast populations: Paraiso - 21.7%; El Carmen - 28.4% ;Veracruz - 25.6%; Saladero - 30.2%; and Tamiahua - 40.5%. Among Indian groups, Lisker et al (1996) found among the Chontal have 5% and the Cora .8% African admixture. The Chontal speak a Mayan language. According to Crawford et al. (1974), the mestizo population of Saltillo has 15.8% African ancestry, while Tlaxcala has 8% and Cuanalan 18.1%. The Olmecs built their civilization in the region of the current states of Veracruz and Tabasco. Now here again are the percentages of African ancestry according to Lisker et al (1996): Paraiso - 21.7% ; El Carmen - 28.4% ; Veracruz - 25.6% ; Saladero - 30.2% ; Tamiahua - 40.5%. Paraiso is in Tabasco and Veracruz is, of course, in the state of Veracruz. Tamiahua is in northern Veracruz, in which these areas were the first places in Mexico settled by the Olmecs. Given the frequency of African admixture with the Mexicans a comparison of Olmec mask, statuettes and other artifacts show many resemblances to contemporary Mexican groups.

African ancestry has been found among indigenous groups that have had no historical contact with African slaves and thus support an African presence in America, already indicated by African skeletons among the Olmec people. M. Coe, writing in Regional Perspective on the Olmecs (1989), (ed.) by Sharer and Grove, observed that “ on the contrary, is that the Olmec style of art, and Olmec engineering ability suddenly appeared full fledged from about 1200 BC." M.E. Pye makes it clear that it was around 1200 BC that Olmec civilization rose in Mesoamerica. The Olmec heads, which look like Africans, do so because they were Africans who modeled for the heads. Did you know that Africa is less than 2,000 miles from South America? This is what they keep suppressed, they don't want you to know that there is pre-Columbian African presence in the Americas, let alone know that you were already in America before 1619. That's why they don't tell you that when the continent was discovered, there were found in the West Indies and Central America, tribes of the black race. They love for you to think you are enlightened because you familiar with the North Atlantic Slave Trade and slave ships, they know that's nothing, its weak in comparison to your real history.

They don't tell you that there is more proof of ancient Negro arrivals, such as Negro colonies that were found by the Spanish and Portuguese discoverers on the eastern coasts of South and Central America. They will never tell you that Mendoza encountered a tribe of Negroes, and Balboa, when on his famous expeditions of the discovery of the Pacific Ocean, met in the old province Quareca, at only two days’ travel from the Gulf of Darien, with a settlement of Negroes. In 1920 Leo Weiner, a Harvard University philologist, produced a pioneering examination of the existence of Africans in the Americas prior to the arrival of Columbus, which appeared as volume one of African and the discovery of America. Volumes two and three followed in 1922. While doing an investigation of native American languages, Wiener learned to his amazement that there was a considerable African influence on these languages. So after further study he was led to conclude that much of the American archaeological work done on both Africans and native Americans was erroneous. Commenting on his work he says,

"In the first volume I show that Negroes had a far greater influence upon American civilization than has heretofore been suspected. In the second volume I shall chiefly study the African fetishism, which even with the elaborate books on the subject, is woefully misunderstood, and I shall show by documentary evidence to what extraordinary extent the Indian medicine-man owes his evolution to the African medicine-man".

Arguing that West Africans had made numerous voyages to America before Columbus, Wiener noted that:

"The presence of Negroes with their trading masters in America before Columbus is proved by the representation of Negroes in American sculpture and design, by the occurrence of a black nation at Darien early in the XVI century, but more specifically by Columbus’ emphatic reference to Negro traders from Guinea, who trafficked in a gold alloy, guanin, of precisely the same composition and bearing the same name, as frequently referred to by early writers in Africa".

As additional proof, he noted the presence of West African words for numerous crops in various native- American languages and suggested that the crops were indigenous to Africa.

"Indeed when we turn to the appellations of the sweet potato and yam in America, we find nothing but African forms. Here as there the two are confounded, and chiefly those names have survived which Dr. Chanca mentioned in 1494. he called the plant he described, apparently the sweet potato, both nabi and hage. We see that the first is a phonetic variation of Wolof nyambi, etc., ‘yam".

Another scholar concerned with pre-Columbian African influence in the Americas strengthens Wieners’s position regarding the African presence in ancient Mexican history. Joel A. Rogers, the prolific Black writer and student of world civilization, in Africa’s Gift to America suggested that “Africa played a role, perhaps, the chief role in the earliest development of America—a period that antedates Columbus by many centuries, namely Aztec, Maya, and Inca civilizations. About 500 B.C. or earlier, Africans sailed over to America and continued to do so until the time of Columbus. Additionally, Rogers quoted several Mexican authorities on the subject:

"C.C. Marquez says, ‘The Negro type is seen in the most ancient Mexican sculpture. . . . Negroes figure frequently in the most remote traditions.’

"Riva-Palacio, Mexican historian, says, ‘It is indisputable that in very ancient times the Negro race occupied our territory (Mexico). The Mexicans recall a negro god, Ixtilton, which means ‘black face’.”

Victor W. Von Hagen discussed the pre-Aztec civilization known as the Olmecs, in which he puts the existence of the Olmecs between 800 B.C. and 600 A.D., indicating that they were situated in the south of Mexico near Vera Cruz, Tabasco, and La Venta. Of the Olmecs, Von Hagen writes:

"The huge stone heads of Olmec deities, exhibited an unmistakably African physiognomy, as can be easily seen from the photographs and drawings of these massive sculptures. During the last decade of the 19th century, the first of these gigantic heads was found in Vera Cruz by J. M. Melgar, who in 1896 published a monograph on his findings. “This cabeza colossal, as the Mexicans called it, was half buried, but enough of it was visible for an occasional observant traveler to notice its ‘Ethiopian features’ and the presence of a headdress resembling a football helmet".

Later, in 1902, an Olmec artifact was found near the Bay of Campeche in the Gulf of Mexico. The jade figurine contained a date on it corresponding to 98 B.C. Interested in this find, Matthew Sterling, an American archaeologist and director of the Bureau American Ethnology, was to lead nine expeditions into the Mexican Gulf coast commencing in 1938, at which time he found five colossal heads in La Venta in the state of Tabasco, five to nine feet high and weighing as much as 20 to 30 tons each. In 1946, Sterling carried out another expedition in the San Lorenzo plateau, an area in southeastern Vera Cruz. Once more the huge stone heads were found, all of which again contained African facial features. During the spring of 1967, Michael Coe, of Yale University, led an expedition to San Lorenzo in southeast Mexico. As did Sterling, Coe located numerous Olmec artifacts, which again included a giant stone head, as well as altars and pyramids. Coe suggests that the Olmecs were the earliest Maya and had declined by the rise of the Aztecs. One might merely ask himself: if Africans were not present in the Americas before Columbus, why the typically African physiognomy on the monuments? It is in contradiction to the most elementary logic and to all artistic experience to suggest that these ancient Olmec artists could have depicted, with such detail, African facial features they had never seen.

So as you have been shown, Africans arrived in the Americas long before Columbus, and long before the 20 contract bound slaves were brought over in 1619 to Jamestown Virginia, which were released after 7 years. Von Wuthenau made this statement saying "The Negroid element is the exception, but is well proven by the large Olmec stone monuments as well as the terracotta items and therefore cannot be excluded from pre- Columbian history of the Americas. Furthermore, it is precisely the Negroid representations which often indicate personalities of high position, who can unhesitatingly be compared to the outstanding Negroes who served as models for great works of art in Egypt and in Nigeria". Harold G. Lawrence, in an article, “African Explorers of the New World,” states emphatically, “We can now positively state that the Mandingoes of the Mali and Songhay Empires, and possibly other Africans, crossed the Atlantic to carry on trade with the Western Hemisphere Indians and further succeeded in establishing colonies throughout the Americas". As you seeing, we putting a bullet in these Cults doctrine showing they are weak as creek water in understanding, and their knowledge doesn't go no further than Deuteronomy 28, Leviticus 26, From Babylon to Timbuktu, The Apocrypha, The Josephus, Strong's Concordance, The Two Babylons, you tube videos, and it works because of your lack of knowledge.

The author J. A. Rogers writes:

“it is even possible that Columbus had heard of the New World from Africans brought* to Spain and Portugal in his time. Furthermore, Columbus spent some time in West Africa just before he left Spain for America".

Basil Davidson, in The Lost Cities of Africa, supplied further evidence, showing that trans-Atlantic voyages were made by West African seamen before and during the reign of Mansa Musa. He comments:

"Omari, in the tenth chapter of his Masalik al-absad, reproduces a story which suggests that Atlantic voyages were made by mariners of West Africa in the times of Emperor Kankan Musa of Mali; and which roundly states that the predecessors of Kankan Musa embarked on the Atlantic with “two thousand ships” and sailed westward and disappeared . . . yet Mali had outlets of the Atlantic seaboard, while North African mariners evidently knew of the Azores several centuries before the voyages of Columbus".

What further more proof do you need, I should be able to stop right here, but we have to once again bury all the false doctrine out whether on paper or videos by these cults. So if you listening to that bull dookie about 1619 to 2019 doctrine, you might as well believe in the Rapture and become a Christian. Did you know about the black nation of the Yamassee, who existed in America before Columbus, and had a large kingdom in the South eastern U.S? Their descendants were among the first Blacks of pre-columbian American origins who fell victim to kidnapping for the purpose of enslavement. Why don't they tell you that the descendants of the Yamassee are the millions of blacks who live in Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and northern Florida, who are the relatives of the same Africans who sailed to America of their own free will, while Europe was in the Dark Ages?

The experience of the Washitaw Nation (or Ouchita Nation) of the Southern United States is another piece of solid evidence for the fact of pre-Columbian African presence and settlement in the Americas and specifically in the United States. According to an article carried in the magazine, 'The Freedom Press Newsletter, (Spring, 1996), reprinted from Earthways, The Newsletter of the Sojourner Truth Farm School (August, 1995), the Washitaw were (and still are) a nation of Africans who existed in the Southern U.S. and Mississippi Valley region long before the 16th century Europeans arrived and even before there were "Native Americans" on the lands the Washitaw once occupied and still occupy today, did you know that? Did you know that according to the article, "the Washitaw Nation "governed three million acres of land in Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas and Mississippi? They were ship builders (similar to the Garifuna of the Caribbean, who are also of pre-Columbian West Afrucan Mandinka Muslim origins (according to Harold Lawrence in 'African Presence in Early America,edt. by Ivan Van Sertima).

What is even more fascinating about this aspect of hidden history of Blacks in America before Columbus is that the Washitaw Nation was known and recognized as a separate, independant Black nation by the Spanish and French, who were in the Louisiana Territories and Texas areas. According to the present leader of the Washitaw Nation, "when Spain ceeded the Louisiana Territory to France, they excluded the land belonging to the Washitaw Nation. France did not include it in the "Louisiana Purchase," and according to the leader, "This land is not part of the United States of America." That point was made in the newspaper, "The Capitol Spotlight, June 1992. In fact, the courts agreed that the land was not part of the U.S. and that in fact the Washitaw (Ouchita) Nation was on the land long before European Colonization: therefore, in legal decisions made, some of the ancient territory was returned. This historical decision was made about 1991. Amazingly you never hear of this either huh?

You know why? Because this is the type of information seldom seen in the majority press, yet, the importance of that event clearly points to the incredible service small papers and magazines such as Ancient American or the Capitol Spotlight and The Freedom Press Newsletter have been making, along with internet news and information sites. So, here we see an example in the continental United States where Africans who came before slavery, before Columbus and thousands of years before Christ (over six thousand years B.C., according to the Washitaw chroniclers), were engaged in boat building, seafaring, trade and commerce in ancient times and who still exist today as a distinct Black Nation who have evidence and proof of their ownership of millions of acres of lands in the Southern U.S. and the Mississippi Valley. The Washitaw Nation held an important convention in June 1992, in Monroe, Louisiana and have held others since.

Yet, the Washitaw is merely one nation of the descendants of pre-columbian Blacks from Africa and elsewhere and possibly from right here in the Americas as the very first people to exist here, long before the development of the Mongoloid, American Indians or the Mongoloid( 15,000 B.C.) or even the Caucasian races (30,000 B.C.). Pure Black Homosapiens began to migrate from Africa and populate the entire earth about 200,000 to 150,000 years ago, according to scientists, historians and anthropologists. I guess this wasn't written in the "Curses" huh? They will not tell you, that in order to take your land and gold and coal and oil and mine fields, the Roman Council of Priests in the mid 1400s, issued a decree that gave Europeans the green light to round you up and enslave all blacks citing that the bible gave them the authority because they are all of the Children of Ham. Now how does that coincide with their doctrine that you didn't exist in America until 1619? Don't go at all, how they rounding blacks up in the 1400s if you didn't get here until 1619 on cargo slave ships?

Did you know that nearly nearly 40 years before the first permanent European settlement in North America, Spanish explorers brought enslaved Africans to what are now the Carolinas, back in 1526? The Africans escaped and this was the first "recorded slave revolt" in North America. Did you know that in 1527, a black man named Estevan, was the first identified Muslim in North America, who lands in Florida as a Moroccan guide to the Spaniards? Did you know that it wasn't until 1641, that slavery was first declared legal? O yeah Massachusetts became the first British colony to legitimize slavery, in which other states soon followed suit, thus rights for free Africans are gradually restricted. By 1662, all children born to slave parents in Virginia are enslaved as well, and slavery became a self-perpetuating system, which you see still exists by your European family last name, your birth certificate, your social security card and other commercial instruments.

Did you know that in 1701 there was a drive put forth to convert slaves over to Christianity? The English Crown, chartered the Society for Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts of the Anglican Church, to convert slaves and Native Americans to Christianity. The drive to convert slaves was not welcomed by all slaveholders, but however many are unwilling to allow their slaves to receive religious instruction, fearing that they will no longer be able to claim them as property once they are baptized. In 1705, Virginia passed a law that all laborers who "were not Christians in their Native Country... shall be slaves. A Negro, mulatto and Indian slaves ... shall be held to be real estate." Did you know this is how you came to be in Christianity? You were whipped and beat and crucified and gutted like fish and thrown into prisons and were killed, if you didn't become a Christian. Government, indirectly put "govern the mental", so I ask you my brothers and sisters, whose governing your mental?

Let me give you some more suppressed information, did you know that the Council, decided that without the attendance of the Pope, that Jerome become secretary to Pope Damascus, and in about 382 and he was commissioned to bring various texts together to produce the Bible in Latin, the official language of Rome? Did you know he was commissioned to do so by the Roman Council, because most Christians could not understand what it said because they didn’t read Latin, thus giving the Catholic Church priests power to control their understanding because they had to rely on them to tell what it said they should do? See they don't tell you this, many people were condemned and killed for the crime of translating the Bible into English because doing so allowed millions to actually read the texts the priests were using to control and terrify them with. Did you know this same Jerome who had his version of the bible known as the Vulgate, edited the texts as he saw fit and rejected those which didn’t support the creed of Nicaea? This same Jerome and Augustine both agreed that women were morally and spiritually inferior and that sex and earthly pleasures were a source of evil which kept men from their spiritual path. So what did they do, well they examined 13 gospels, 9 acts and teachings of the Apostles, plus 31 letters and other writings, and then they decided which were "orthodox" and which were to be rejected.

Their choice was supported by the Council of Carthage in 397 and confirmed again by Pope Innocent I a hundred years later, in which Jerome’s Vulgate Bible became widely accepted as the version. Then the Council of Trent in 1545, decreed that it was the only acceptable one for Roman Catholics. Did you know that out of the 53 gods the Council came up with, they shorten it down by way of votes to Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus? Constantine ruled that the name of the Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god. A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities become one God. Thus placing Hesus and Krishna among the Roman gods as one individual composite. Since there was no J's around then, this name gradually became transformed into Jesus Christ. Yes, your Saviour is created by the pen of men. Constantine was trying to solidify his empire, and it was becoming impossible to do with the various religious groups warring and fighting against each other in Rome.

So Constantine informed the religious leaders of these groups that if they didn't come together and join in some kind of union or compromise to format a religion, then their individual religious groups would not be counted as legal in Rome. So the various religious groups came and put their best effort into proving their particular doctrine of belief and deity into the compromise, which this compromise which was formed was called the Holy Roman Catholic Church, in which they deemed the word Catholic to mean "universal". None of these religious groups who merged to form this compromise, were satisfied, so they sought for a further defining term to call their new composite in the new religion of Rome, the concept of Hesus Krishna, Jesus the Christ was the result and most of them could accept that because they had no hostility toward either term. So the name Jesus was chosen as the name of the Saviour, or centerpiece of the religion because it meant "Neither He nor She." It was a neutral word between the former religious now compromised groups.

Also did you know that when you read the bible, you only see the lineage going through the men? That's because the Church of Rome feared the power of a women, so in 1138 they implemented a rule of celibacy for their priests which became law. Understand that women become wives in which women have influence over the man, they feared that, and also they become mothers, which through them is a continuation of bloodlines. Now if they don't believe in being intimate with women, and they are in charge of formatting the books of the bible and have the power of the pen of the scribes to write and erase, why would they uphold the status of women in the church? They wouldn't, which is why any book written of by a woman or supported the authority of Matriarch, became unapproved and unacceptable to be added to the bible, thus were some buried and hidden and burned in the 4th century. Also you must understand that there are convoluted and distorted versions of the bible which are published purposely.

The Gospels, they were translated into Church Latin in the 4th century, but it was then to be more than a thousand years before any English translation was made, in which the present English-language Gospels date back to the Authorized Bible compiled for King James VI Stuart of Scots (James I of England) in the early 17th century. What you have to understand is that, Bible translation was a risky business in those days, in which for daring to translate the Bible into English, the 14th-century reformer John Wycliffe was denounced as a heretic and his books were burned. In the early 16th century William Tyndale was executed by strangulation in Belgium, and then burned just to ensure his death, for translating the Bible into English. A little later, Miles Coverdale (a Tyndale disciple) made another translation but, at that stage, the Church had split into two main factions. So therefore as a result, Coverdale’s version was accepted by the Protestant Church, although he remained a heretic in the eyes of Rome.

Just like I said before, the problem was that, as long as the printed text remained in an obscure form of Church Latin which only the bishops could understand or interpret, they could teach whatever they wanted, but if it were translated into popular languages that people could read for themselves, the Church teachings would doubtless be open to question. It is the Bible translated for King James upon which the majority of subsequent English-language editions have been based. But, in practice, this 17th-century Authorized Version was not a direct translation from anything, in fact it was mostly translated from the Greek, partly from the Latin and, to some extent, from the works of others who had made previous illegitimate translations. In their rendering of the New Testament, King James’s linguists endeavored to appease both the Protestants and the Catholics, which this was the only way to produce a generally acceptable text, but their ambition was not entirely successful. Why, because the Catholics thought the translators were siding with the Protestants and tried to blow up King James in the Houses of Parliament (the famous Gunpowder Plot), while the Protestants maintained that the King was in league with the Catholics!

The translators were not only concerned with denominational appeasement, but rather they also tried for something that we would today call "political correctness". In one instance, the direct translation referred to a group of people called "heavenly soldiers", but this was crossed out and "heavenly army" was inserted instead. This wasn't pleasing, so therefore it was deleted yet again because the concept of an armed unit was not acceptable, so therefore they replaced "heavenly army" with "heavenly host". This drew a little concern, because no one knew precisely what a "host" was, so therefore the word was resurrected after centuries of obscurity to enter the dictionaries of the era with the vague description: "a lot of people". Understand that a good deal of relevant content has been misrepresented, misunderstood, mistranslated, or simply just lost in the telling.

As where today the people are made to believe Christ was a Christian along with Apostle Paul, when originally in the 1st century, the texts revealed that Christ was a Nazarene. But that wasn't what they would bring to understanding for the people who didn't have the texts they did, because they figured if they were going to control the people, they had to believe the Savior of their souls was in agreement to their fabricated religion of Christianity. So therefore, it is taught to the people that Christ is a Christian, rather than a Nazarene, as where the Bible’s Acts of the Apostles, confirms that both Jesus’s brother James and St Paul were leaders of the sect of the Nazarenes. The word "Christian" wasn't even in use until it was first recorded in AD 44 in Antioch, Syria. So now I leave you with an abundance of knowledge to consider, so that you can come out of darkness and into the marvelous light, and govern your mental. Ultimate Transformer was part 1, Who's Governing Your Mental is part 2, and part 3 is in the works shall be completely Most High willing today, it shall truly be a masterpiece. I been patiently waiting for this for 2 years now, and now its time to blow intellectual levee's. Shalom brothers and sisters.