Shalom brothers and sisters, you need to know that at the Council of Nicaea, there was a total of 318 bishops and priests and deacons and sub-deacons, acolytes - a person who performs ceremonial duties such as lighting altar candles, and exorcists. They gathered together to debate and decide upon a unified belief system that encompassed only one god, in which many ministers were in support of a variety of Eastern and Western gods and goddesses. Such as - "Jove, Jupiter, Salenus, Baal, Thor, Gade, Apollo, Juno, Aries, Taurus, Minerva, Rhets, Mithra, Theo, Fragapatti, Atys, Durga, Indra, Neptune, Vulcan, Kriste, Agni, Croesus, Pelides, Huit, Hermes, Thulis, Thammus, Eguptus, Iao, Aph, Saturn, Gitchens, Minos, Maximo, Hecla and Phernes." They don't tell you that Constantine then instructed Eusebius, the Bishop of Caesarea, a Church historian and his religious advisor, to organize the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the religious texts submitted at the council. In which he instructed him to:

"Search ye these books, and whatever is good in them, that retain; but whatsoever is evil, that cast away. What is good in one book, unite ye with that which is good in another book. And whatsoever is thus brought together shall be called The Book of Books. And it shall be the doctrine of my people, which I will recommend unto all nations, that there shall be no more war for religions' sake."

Thus further he stated unto Eusebius, saying:

"Make them to astonish" said Constantine, and "the books were written accordingly"

So in all actuality, he told him to make them in such a manner, that they would bring about a fill with sudden wonder and amazement. So what Constantine had on his agenda, was to end all the bickering and wars between each individual religious groups, by combining a collection of myths from each one of them, to compile together in hopes of uniting the variant and opposing religious groups under one religion. Which this is amazing, because its the same thing the Elite in power are about to execute, in which they have laid down the ground work through the New Age Movement. So just as Constantine sought out to solidify his empire with the institution of One Universal Religion, so are the Elite today in power seeking out the same agenda. After
receiving order from Constantine, Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce, "fifty sumptuous copies ... to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by all professional scribes who were thoroughly accomplished in their art". In which upon completion, they were sent to Constantine bound in volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms. They were not called the New Testament just yet, instead they were called the "New Testimonies", in which that was the first mention of the New Testament in the historical record.

So that goes to show you, for one, you had no Christianity until the 4th century, in which it wasn't coined as being "Christianity" until the 15th century, and two, you had no New Testament until the 4th century either. So your Baptist and Methodist and Mormon and Protestant and Jehovah Witness and all other religions now under Christianity today, didn't even exist. Methodist Religion was founded by John Wesley in 1744, then from that religion, came the birth of the AME Religion which was founded by Bishop Richard Allen in 1816. The Mormon Religion was founded by Jospeh Smith in 1829, the Baptist Religion was founded by John Smyth in 1605, but credit is given to Roger Williams & John Clarke as founders in 1639. The Pentecostal Religion was founded by Charles Fox Parham in 1895, as also was the Church of God In Christ was founded by Bishop Charles Mason in 1895. The Holiness Religion was founded by Charles Grandison Finney but credited is given to John Wesley as sparking the movement in 1746, the Jehovah's Witnesses was founded by Charles Taze Russell in 1870, the Presbyterian Religion was founded by John Knox in 1560, the Lutheran Religion was founded by Martin Luther in 1517.

Nation Of Islam Religion was founded by Wallace Fard Muhammad, really by the Catholic Church, the Seventh Day Adventists Religion was founded by Ellen G White, the Apostolic Religion was founded by Henry Drummond, the Protestant Religion was founded by Chaplain George Stull, the Salvation Army Religion was founded by William Booth in 1865, the Christian Scientist Religion was founded by Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy in 1879, the Congregationalist Religion was founded by Robert Brown in 1582, the Unitarian Religion was founded by Theophilus Lindley in 1774, and the Dutch Reformed Religion was founded by Michaelis Jones in 1628, thus showing you religion was never founded by the Most High God of Israel, but is the invention of man led by Satan. Riddle me this, how is it that you carry a book, claiming to be of some religion, that the man who you believe in as the Savior, never even claimed to be? So how can your religion teach you about a Savior who walked the earth thousands of years ago, which upon formation of the book you carry, your religion never existed? This is how come those in religion are blind, because they fail to see their following the men and women who created the religion they are in, based on supporting their social, economic, and political agenda.

This is how come you all can believe in one God, but yet are divided in many religions, because though you may believe in the same God, you all have different social and economic and political viewpoints. So if there is one God, then who would be the author of this division that religion brings, if in 1 Corinthians 14:33 it says the Most High is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all assemblies of the saints? The devil, which goes to show you, religion is of the devil, Satan himself is the author of this division to keep the people in an illusion of thinking they worshiping the Most High, when really they serving him in darkness. Your pastor can't tell you this cause he is in darkness himself, not to say he is purposely trying to deceive you, though some are, but yet some are not but rather are a they also a victim of Satan through the institution of Christianity at the hands of the Roman Catholic Church under Constantine the Great. The Roman Catholic Church went out a gathered all the information they could at various times in history, and they suppressed what they didn't agree with or what they didn't want the people to know.

They will never tell the people this, nor will they tell them that all religions are nothing more than forms of government, in which they exist only because people "believe in them" and support them financially. This is where they make a fool out of the people, because they will say "I have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ or with my Creator", but yet be in a personal relationship with someone but don't attend or finanically support relationship counseling centers. Does not the counseling center assist with your growth as religion is suppose to? Indeed it does, but how personal would your relationship be if those of the counseling center was always present in your relationship? Wouldn't be personal at all, but yet its the same thing with religion so whats the difference. The difference is money, you support one and not the other until the one seem as if its not keeping you or your spouse, then it points you in direction of the other, so really religion and relationship counseling centers are working together to get paid off your personal relationship.

Ask yourself, how is it that Christ is the mediator between you and the Most High seeing as how he is door, and the root of "mediator is medius thus meaning middle", but yet religion is suppose to be your link to the Most High? So in all actuality, religion is setup as the middle man or negotiator between you and God, thus does it erase Christ as being the mediator and door and opens up itself as a new window toward salvation. You see that? Which means if you developed this perspective, then you would understand who is government, meaning "govern the mental". Once your able to comprehend for yourself who is governing your mental, then can you be like "my relationship is with Jesus Christ and my Creator, therefore I don't need religion to be the middle man which is what Jesus Christ says he is." These institutions would then fall through the cracks if you actually woke up to knowing this information, this is why they are design to keep you sleep.

John 14:6 - Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

FYI: Where in this precept did he say, religion is the way, the truth, and the life, no man cometh unto the Father, but through religion and church? Nowhere, because he never said that, so you need to ask yourself, who is governing your mental that got you thinking otherwise? If Christ says I am the way, that means there is no other way outside of him that is divinely designed to give you access to the Most High. Mary didn't give birth to a religion or a church, and if 1 Peter 2:21 says Christ suffered for us and left us an example that we should follow his steps, then if a man or woman is the author of your religion how could you be following the steps of Christ seeing as how Mary didn't give birth to a religion? So that means you following the man or woman who gave birth to the religion you are in, and not Christ, thus are you being played for a monkey fool. You getting prostitute treatment, which is keep you deceived in the dark making you feel good after a long hard week of work, just so you can pay the pimp preacher to make you feel good about being a slave for the government. Yes, the pastor and the government go hand in hand, who do you think license them to preach?
The Most High doesn't give a man a degree to preach his word, but rather anoints him by way of his divine Spirit, not by putting a cap and gown on him.

FYI: That's foolishness of the world, how can any man tell you the Most High called him to preach but yet has a certificate or degree with the signature of man upon it giving him permission to do what the Most High supposedly called him to do? You got to think higher than what you do people, if you say you believe in the Most High and so does your friend who is Baptist and your cousin who is Protestant and your co-worker who is Methodist, then how come yall are divided on Sunday morning into different churches? That shows you are following the steps of the person who created the religion you are in, in which they following the canons and laws of the institution Constantine helped establish, which is the Roman Catholic Church. So your not following Christ, that was the deception used to bring you under the subjection of the government who is the body of enforcers of the people's belief. See those in religion are taught that when they hear "The Church" or "Christ and the Church", that its directly talking about the body of believers in Christ Jesus. No my people, what they will not tell you is that, it is really the body of believers who are governed by Roman Civil Laws and Cannons within the Holy Roman Catholic Church, which is legally "the church". So no matter what religion you are in, your Catholic whether you like it or not.

Question: What did Peter say unto Christ?

John 6:68 - Then Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.

FYI: To whom shall we go, thus implying there was no other who was authorized or anointed by the Most High who could teach them and guide toward eternal life, other than him the Messiah or Savior. The Pharisees and Sadducess and the scribes were corrupted, so who is there other than the Messiah who had the only doctrine that could instruct and save them? Nobody, thus for one, showing they were not looking for a religion, but rather for him who had the power to grant eternal life and be a redeemer unto them. Religion doesn't have no life, if it did you wouldn't have to believe in it for it to exist, so its just like throwing change in a wishing well, cause it can't gurantee that in which you hoping for. So whoever is the founder of your religion, that is who your "Lord and Christ" really is until you come out of religion which is the physical manifestation of the shadow of Satan's darkness. Religion teach for doctrine the commandments of men, and which ever one pleases and supports the lifestyle of men, do they flock to, which is why there are so many but yet only one Most High God of Israel. If they all believe him, then why don't they all attend worship together? Simply because the beliefs of one doesn't support the lifestyle of another, thus showing the people are following the commandments of men.

Do you know where that traces all the way back to? Well it traces back over the previous ensuing centuries, where Constantine's New Testimonies were expanded upon, "interpolations" were added and other writings were included, such as what you call today the Epistles of the Apostle Paul. What is untold to you the people, is that in 397 John Chrysostom restructured the writings of Apollonius of Tyana, a first-century wandering sage, and made them part of the New Testimonies. Understand that, the Latinized name for Apollonius is Paulus in Latin, according to the Latin - English Dictionary, by J. T. White back in 1880, in which these writings the Roman Catholic Church accepted and added them as being known today as the Epistles of Paul. See these are secrets you the people are not suppose to know, such as the Roman Catholic Church admitting that the Epistles of Paul are forgeries, saying,

"Even the genuine Epistles were greatly interpolated to lend weight to the personal views of their authors"

(Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vii, p. 645).

Now you can begin to understand as to why the Roman Catholic Church were slaughtering all who knew of their deception and how they created the gospels and arranged the books as they saw fit according to their agenda. It was to be called the Book of Books, but since a majority of Eastern groups out numbered all in attendance, and were Sun worshippers, and with Constantine himself being a worshipper of the Greek Sun god Apollo, he named it Helios Biblios, which means "The Sun Book". This was done in the very beginning of constructing what is known today as being the bible, between 324 and 355 AD, by the Council of Nicaea under Emperor Constantine The Great. Then they slowly developed a "God", a personage, to replace the Sun, and slowly changed the books, disposing of any material not in agreement with their belief and teachings. They changed meanings, and every scribe that worked on this construction, kept changing and editing things as belief systems were revised with the prevailing times. I can do deeper into the vaults so lets go.
Did you know that, in the Encyclopaedia Biblica by Adam & Charles Black of London in 1899 vol. iii, p. 3344, the Roman Catholic Church made known its knowledge about exclusions in old Bibles? Thus saying:

"The remark has long ago and often been made that, like Paul, even the earliest Gospels knew nothing of the miraculous birth of our Saviour".

If the public had known that, it would have shaken them to their core, to find out that the virgin birth account they have been given, such as the Most High God of Israel, impregnating Mary by way of his spirit, without the aide of a man, never existed until after the 4th century. They the Roman Catholic Church, were following the Babylonian religious system of worship, in which the Babylonians worshipped the mother and child Semiramis and Tammuz, which is where you get your T shaped cross from and 40 days of lent, which is really the 40 days of weeping, after the Sun God Tammuz which you read about in Ezekiel the 8th chapter.

Ezekiel 8:14 - Then he brought me to the door of the gate of the LORD's house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.

So as you see, you have been deceived to the highest State of the Art, cause its off of Semiramis and Tammuz that the Catholic Church along with all others got their virgin birth doctrine from. Before Christ was ever born virgins where having man child's on December 25, and were being honored and worshipped as mother and child, which no man was ever included, which is why you have Joseph being made to appear as a non factor. Constantine couldn't draw in all other pagan religious groups into one universal religion, without having to take into account their deity of being. For example, you have Krishna of India who was born to the virgin Maia on December 25, Horus of Egypt who was born to the virgin Isis on December 25, Buddha of India who was born to the virgin Maya on December 25, Attis of Pyrygia who was born to the virgin Nana on December 25, and you have Tammuz who was born to the virgin Semiramis on December 25, and since the council selected their one composite god, thus do you have later translated in history Hesus Krishna, as being Jesus Christ who was born to the virgin Mary.

So they gave you the same story line, just switched up the name of the characters, in which this is how when the Roman Catholic Church begin going to the four corners of the world with their new religion, it was easy for all the other nations to accept Jesus Christ and Mary, cause hey, their names just different because of region, but the story is still the same. So upon that, the people had no problem converting as Catholics to later become Christians under Christianity. Their wanting to add the virgin birth doctrine of ancient to the bible, posed as a problem for them, because they couldn't make Christ appear as being born of virgin, without contradicting the scriptures of the Old Testament, which said he was to be of the house and lineage of David. See what you don't know also is that, when Eusebius assembled scribes to write the New Testimonies, he couldn't just combine all myths from each religious group cause that would expose them, but what he did was mix in some truth to go along with the myths that would confuse the people so well, that they wouldn't be able to determine their agenda.

So what did he do, well he produced a single document that was actually written by one of Christ's apostles, that was originally kept hidden, to become the master version which this compilation would be established off of. Do you know what this document is called today? It is known today as the gospel of Mark, in which in the Catholic Encyclopedia, by Farley ed., vol. vi, p. 657, the Roman Catholic Church admits this that Mark was really the first book, and not the second as you see it as being today in the New Testament. In order to complete the compilation, the scribes had to rely mainly upon this gospel of Mark in order to format their deception of a virgin birth, using it as the source and framework to inter-weave or inject their agenda. See now you can understand why the lineage in the book of Luke is entirely different than the lineage in the book of Matthew after David, because they switched the books to support this doctrine. This is how come when you go into the book of Matthew, it starts with the lineage first, but when you go into the book of Luke, the lineage starts at the bottom and goes up. This was purposely done so you would have to read backwards to get to Christ in the book of Luke just so that you can understand what lineage it's talking about.

The Roman Catholic Church wanted you to have the understanding that Joseph was not even a factor, and that he had nothing to do with anything, when really he is Christ's biological father, and and Christ is the Son of God with power by resurrection from the dead with power. In Romans 1:3 this is explained saying - Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; So in order for him to be made of the seed, in which for seed to come in, one has to produce copulation also called sperm. Otherwise without sperm going into a woman, a man cannot produce seed in the flesh, which is why they focus you on Mary lineage, instead of Joseph's lineage in Luke 2:4 which says - And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of Nazareth, into Judaea, unto the city of David, which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of the house and lineage of David:). You see that, they focus you on Mary to keep you from seeing Joseph was the one of the house and lineage of David, and in order for Christ to be the seed of David, he would have to come through a relative of David's family. Romans 1:4 - And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

So by Joseph impregnating Mary, was how Christ was of the seed of David according to the flesh, and he was declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the "spirit" of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead, which is how he was the Son of God. But they didn't need to people to know that of him being of the seed of David as foretold in the Old Testament, because if the people knew, then they wouldn't be able to pass off the Babylonian religious worship system of the "mother and child", being impregnated by the Sun God with his spirit without the aide of a man, which is implemented in society today as being Child Support. Where the father is excluded, and the rights and focus go upon the woman and child, and the man is demoted as if he had nothing to do with his child or children being brought into the earth. So now you can understand why the book of Mark is not the first of the gospels, because they had to shuffle the scriptures and switch the books to confuse you on the lineages. See this is why they take you directly to Matthew 1:18 to show you were they edited the text to make it appear as if Mary was found with child as if the Most High impregnated her by his Spirit. So they straight caused the people to blaspheme with that belief, cause they themselves committed blasphemy. So as you now know, you have been deceived to the highest State of the Art.

One of the greatest deceptions taught to you the people by the Roman Catholic Church, is that Christ was born in a stable, despite nowhere in the gospels do they say that. His birth is not even mentioned in the book of Mark nor the book of John, but in the book of Luke they forgot to edit out the reference showing he was born in a house. You get the stable perpcetion, because the scribes of latter times were having to work from mistranslations and false interpretations of the gospel of Luke that was given to them, stating that Jesus was "laid in a manger." So because of that, they give you a barn yard Sesame Street account, instead of correcting it and telling you that what you call a cradle today, a manger was the common use for cradles, like a bassinet, and they were kept in doors for that purpose. Because of the mistranslation and false interpretation account of Luke given down to the latter scribes, of there being "no room in the inn", is the reason why you think Christ was born outside like an animal. They make it crystal clear to make movies and christmas cards of such portraying this deception, while all the while knowing the old manuscript never said such a thing. They never tell you that there were no inns in the region then, which is why travellers lodged in private houses and family hospitality was the way of life back in those days.

Which is why when you go to Matthew 10 where Christ commands his disciples to go unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel, he said:

Matthew 10:11-13 - And into whatsoever city or town ye shall enter, enquire who in it is worthy; and there abide till ye go thence. And when ye come into an house, salute it. And if the house be worthy, let your peace come upon it: but if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you.

Thus showing you, that if there were inns that they could have stayed at, then it wouldn't have been no need for them to enter into the people's house and reside. Which if you read back up to verse 9 and 10 of Matthew 10, you'll see Christ told them not to carry any money with them nor coats or shoes, which if there were inns, these would be things you would need. No one checks into a hotel without money or clothes to change into, so now you should really begin to see how they have hoodwinked you, because their are various accounts of Sun gods being born in stables outside in the barn. So as you see, you still reading to an extent, the Helios Biblios meaning "The Sun Book", because as you see, a lot within has been taken from Sun worship, just as worshiping on Sun-Day. They gave you this Sun God account of being miraculously born of a virgin outside in a barn like an animal, when the originally text says that there was "no provision in the room". Which the book of Matthew tells you he was in a house, and the original text of Mark says he was laid in a manger, because there was no cradle provided in the room.

Then to really get into the deception of imposing the date of the Sun God mystical birthday into belief, to where you wouldn't be able to determine Christ birthday, they gave you the only two gospels that speak of his birth, with both giving different times for his birth. Those two books as you should know now, where Matthew and Luke, which is amazing because the book which was the master version document, was the book of Mark, which details nothing about Christ birth at all. That should tell you automatically, that they again purposely were trying to deceive the people so that they can institute the belief of the Sun Gods birthday, as being Christ birthday, the fictitious day of December 25, but yet gives no year. This should make you wonder, how did they get that when the master version never said such a thing, which would go to show you the myth part of the religious groups belief in their Sun deities that was added to the bible story line. Follow me close here, according to the book of Matthew, Jesus was born in the reign of Herod the Great, who debated the event with the wise men and apparently ordered the slaying of the infants, in which King Herod died in the notional year of 4 BC. So from the book of Matthew, we know that Christ was born before that, which because of this, most standard bible concordances gives 5 BC as being Christ's date of birth.

Then when you go to the book of Luke, it states that Christ was born while Cyrenius was Governor of Syria, which is the same year that Emperor Augustus implemented the national taxing census, which caused Jospeh and Mary to go to Bethlehem. When you examine records that were recorded in the 1st century Jewish annals such as "The Antiquities of the Jews", you learn that Cyrenius was not appointed Governor of Syria until 6 AD, in which this was the same year that Emperor Augustus implemented the census, which was supervised by Cyrenius himself. So because of the false account of Herod's death given, they even
baffled scholars with this one, because they made it appear as if Christ was born on two separate occasions, with one being before 4 BC and the other one being in 6 AD, leaving out the meaning behind them both. See what the world fails to comprehend seeing as how they are not privy to the history on this subject, is that when you see both of these accounts, its not speaking of one birth as you would think it to be, but rather is speaking on two specific births. One is speaking of his physical birth, and the other is speaking of his community birth, in which back then these were defined as first and second births, with the second as being an initiation into the community by way of a ritual ceremony.

Understand that, second births for boys took place at the age of twelve, also take into account that from the book of Luke we learn that Christ was - Luke 2:42 - And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast. So we learn that in 6 AD, Christ was 12 years old, which the Roman Catholic Church had the latter scribes and translators to completely ignore, and to just combine the teachings of the Matthew and Luke accounts into one, which allowed them to institute the Babylonian Sesame Street doctrine of Christ being born in a stable. So where the two gospels lying about Christ birth, no the bible is not, but the translators are, because with Christ being twelve in 6 AD as proven in Luke, then he was actually born in 7 BC, which was during the late reign of Herod the Great as related in Matthew. So you see how the confusion is easily cleared up? The lack of actual history and information, is what caused this confusion amongst the people today, which is on whole different level than what they think. How so? This lack of information about the specific births, is why the people think Mary and Joseph two grown adults, walked home for a full day's journey, before they finally realized that Christ was not with them. Now that should begin to sound suspicious to you now, since you know what you know now right? Like what parents are just going to forget for a whole day walking in the desert, that their twelve year old son was not with them?

Then they just return back to Jerusalem to find him at the temple discussing his Father's business with the doctors. Some of this stuff should have first been common sense to cause you upon first reading the bible, to be like "what, come on now that doesn't even make sense." The true history was removed from circulation upon translation, so that the people wouldn't understand the specific births, nor understand that there is a difference between a twelve year old son and a son in his twelfth year. Understand that, when a son, on completing his initial twelve years, that is to say, on reaching his thirteenth birthday, when he was initiated into the community at the ceremony of his Second Birth, he was regarded as commencing his first year. This is the root of where today's modern "bar mitzvah" comes from, in which upon his next initiation, which would be the initiation of manhood in the community, this took place in his ninth year, when he was twenty one, which this is also the root that Europeans developed their Free White and 21 privilege status from. So after this, various steps then followed, and the next major test was at the end of his twelfth year, which would be at the age of twenty four.

So therefore, when Christ remained at the temple in his twelfth year, he was actually twenty four years old, and not twelve as they wanted you to believe. See if so much information wasn't suppressed and removed from the bible, the people would know this, but you can't control a people without being in definite stance of their understanding. Thus being in control of their understanding, you decide on how far they can grow, because you already laid the ground work to imprison their minds and lay limitations upon their path toward spiritual enlightenment. So now you can begin to understand as to why the Roman Catholic Church were slaughtering all who knew of their deception and how they created the gospels and arranged the books and erased and took things out, as they saw fit according to their agenda. Cause with just a drop of common sense, the people would be like hold up a minute, how is it that in Luke 2 Christ is twelve years old, but
yet when you go to Luke 3:23 just a chapter over, you learn that he is thirty? See this would expose them if the people had a drop of conscious inner-vision, cause they would be like dang, how did he jumped eighteen years like that? He didn't, which further goes to show you exactly what I'm saying, he was 24 years old as proven and as documentation records, they just don't want you to know that.

So they had to throw the people off in regards to his birth, understand that religion is straight confusion, for it is designed to lead one down the path straight to hell, instituting an abundance of Sun worship into the context of the Most High's word. They will tell you, Christ was a King, but yet turn around and try to convince you of his lineage being through Mary, to support their Babylonian Sun Worship of mother and child doctrine. Oh they love to tell you he is the Son of King David, while all the while knowing what was withheld from the people's understanding, so that they wouldn't catch their Sun God impregnating a virgin deception by trying to use the Most High as impregnating Mary by way of his Spirit. True David was a King as they tell you, the bible bear record to it, true as they tell you he had a strong dynasty, bible bear record to it. But what they took out of the bible period, was the fact that dynastic husband and wife were only allowed to be intimate as in bringing forth children into the world, only in the month of December. This information here is very vital, because had they not took this understanding out of the bible, you the people would have known exactly when Christ birthday was, but not would not be befitting to their celebration of the Sun God's birthday as being December 25.

Well what was the significance of December as being the only month dynastic husband and wife were allowed to be intimate in regards to bringing forth children into the world? Well it was so that the birth of heirs, just as Christ was to be the heir of the throne, would always fall in the month of September, which is the month of Atonement, the holiest day on the calendar. So if the people knew that, then they would know everything prophesied in sequence order would have a fulfillment date, in which the Roman Catholic Church know good and heck well, that Christ was born in 7 BC. Don't let them deceive you no more, they have over 82 forms of authentic documentation that was presented to Constantine upon his ordering of the books to be compiled, in which he rejected them because they were not in agreement with the Sun God's birthday. Out of all recorded factual documentation ever known to man, all show Christ was born on September 15 of 7 BC, and not December 25. This is why still today, they try and silently murder those who know this information thoroughly, for fear of them ever reaching prominent status or mainstream, and causing the people to become privy of their deceptions.

Because of me having also as they have, all of their encyclopedias going all the way back to the 1100s and then some, and vaults of their documents which those who know me on a personal tip, know exactly how I came into this information years before I even had a dream of picking up a bible. They know this is why these people have been trying to shut down my website and pay me off, tap my phones, hire people to work at local places I eat at in hopes of poisoning my food, falsely arrest me to pin me in a car I never owned or driven in my life, blacklisted me from working in the State of Texas, tried to take my son 3 days after he was born, had the CIA do an article over me in China saying I was a Militant Jew with ties to Islamic Extremist, used to have vans sitting outside the house at night monitoring the house, begin sending cobra helicopters to watch me going on over 7 months now, murdered a scientist friend of mine, murdered an Israeli connection of mine, had a 17 year sniper fire 4 shots at me while I was giving my introduction to my speech at a Women's Convention I was invited to, and have been trying to murder me ever since with the latest on board being the AP organization, who have been hired to gather intelligence and create the stage for what is called "Chill Silencing", which is a fancy way of saying "killing a nigger".

The Most High blessed me while I was spiritually retarded, to be in the right place at the right time, using my gift of words to wow over some prominent Arch Bishops, and their daughters, thus gaining their trust which they then wanted me to become a writer for their inquisition. I was able to smuggle out trash bags full of books and documents from their underground library vault, which little did I know was going to play a key factor the day I was to come into compliance with the Most High's laws and statutes and commandments. So yes you can say I have an advantage over most whom you see in this field of study, but I also have the gift of foresight, which as one agent caller put it when calling me saying "and that's one reason you must die nigger". But as anyone know me can tell you, time is very precious to me and I'm careful of how I spend it, but I rather be dead for the rest of this lifetime, than to be a coward living in it. So the next time you see the pope or joke as I call him, look at the fish-shaped hat he wears, that bears the words "Vicarirs Feleii Dei", and know that indicates that he is a "substitute for the Son of God."

Did you know that Pope John XX III upon his reign from 1958-1963, made this statement:

"When we have realized this enormous task (ecumenism), eliminating what, from a human point of view, would be an obstacle, on a path we seek to make more easy, we shall present the church in all her splendor, without spot or wrinkle, and we shall say to all the others who are separated from us, Orthodox, Protestants, etc.: ‘See brothers, here is the Church of Christ! We have done our best to be true to her’."

They didn't even tell you that they instituted the word "church" into the bible, to be in regards to themselves the Roman Catholic Church, the official body of believers. On September 29, 1963, Pope Paul VI (1963-78) made an appeal for Christian unity, and said that the Ecumenical Council’s ultimate goal was the universal union of all Christians, in which he wrote:

"The restoration of unity among all Christians is one of the principal concerns of the Second Vatican Council. Christ the Lord founded one Church and one Church only … For it is only through Christ’s Catholic Church, which is ‘the all-embracing means of salvation,’ that they can benefit fully from the means of salvation…"

Thus do you further see, they set themselves up to be "the church"? They give you no explanation for those hundreds of years of silence, but as Pope Leo X said "the construct of Christianity did not begin until after the first quarter of the fourth century, and that is why I called Christ a "fable". We exposing them hard now, they also didn't tell you that on March 26, 1967, Pope Paul wrote:

"Who can fail to see the need and importance of thus gradually coming to the establishment of a world authority capable of taking effective action on the juridical and political planes? … Delegates to international organizations, public officials, gentlemen of the press, teachers and educators– all of you must realize that you have your part to play in the construction of a new world order."

They don't even tell you this, nor tell you that on September 5, 2000, the Catholic Church issued a document called Dominus Iesus which declared "the Roman Catholic Church to be the only ‘instrument for the salvation of all humanity’." Pope John Paul II said that “Rome must always be the center of all Christianity and the pope must be the head." What is even more amazing, is that the Rothschilds charged Schiff with the task of undermining religion in America, in which Schiff delegated certain responsibilities to John D. Rockefeller, Jr. who later recruited Ward, who had taught religion at the Union Theological Seminary (which Rockefeller helped establish) in New York for 25 years. The Seminary was so liberal that it was known as the “Red Seminary,” because of how many students graduates and faculty members had ties to communist groups. Manning Johnson, a Communist Party member, referred to Ward as “the chief architect for Communist infiltration and subversion in the religious field.”

In 1907, Rockefeller financed Ward’s establishment of the Methodist Foundation of Social Service, which was America’s first Communist-front organization, so in 1908, they reorganized and changed their name to the Federal Council of Churches. Raised as a Baptist, Rockefeller began noticing all of the competition between Protestant groups, and after World War II, got involved with the Interchurch World Movement, contributing over $1 million to its initial budget of $40 million, and traveling the country on a national speaking tour, which it soon went under. Rockefeller was a well-known supporter of evangelist Billy Sunday, and forty years later, donated $75,000 to Billy Graham’s New York crusade. He also donated $26 million to build the Riverside Church, which opened in 1930, which was pastored by Rev. Harry Emerson Fosdick, who was a NCC leader, former President of the Rockefeller Foundation, who had formerly been the pastor at the old First Presbyterian Church at 11th Street and 5th Avenue in New York.

The interdenominational church was located on Riverside Drive in Morningside Heights, a block from Columbia University, and across from the Union Theological Seminary (to whom Rockefeller contributed $1,083,333 in 1922). He was also a large contributor to the World Council of Churches, in which Rockefeller provided the land (across the street from the Riverside Church, which it is connected to via an underground tunnel) for the 19-story triangular-shaped Interchurch Center (475 Riverside Drive, suite 880) that serves as the headquarters for the National Council of Churches in New York City. The membership of the National Council of Churches of Christ in America consists of 36 Protestant, Anglican, and Orthodox denominations. They are the biggest advocate of the ecumenical movement in the country, having well over 140,000 churches, and nearly 50,000,000 members such as:

1. African Methodist Episcopal Church (2,500,000 members), 12th largest U.S. Church
2. African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church (1,296,662), 20th largest U.S. Church
3. Alliance of Baptists
4. American Baptist Churches in the USA (1,436,909), 18th largest U.S. Church
5. Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America (250,000)
6. Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (414,000)
7. Christian Church/Disciples of Christ (1,011,502)
8. Christian Methodist Episcopal Church (718,922)
9. Church of the Brethren (13,132)
10. Coptic Orthodox Church in North America (180,000)
11. Episcopal Church in the USA (2,311,398), 14th largest U.S. Church
12. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (5,125,919), 6th largest U.S. Church
13. Friends United Meeting (50,803)
14. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America (1,500,000), 15th largest U.S. Church
15. Hungarian Reformed Church in America (9,780)
16. International Council of Community Churches (500,000)
17. Korean Presbyterian Church in America
18. Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church
19. Mar Thoma Church
20. Moravian Church in America-North and South Province (50,982)
21. National Baptist Convention of America (3,500,000), 7th largest U.S. Church
22. National Baptist Convention, USA (8,200,000)
23. National Missionary Baptist Convention of America (2,500,000), 13th largest U.S. Church
24. Orthodox Church in America (1,000,000), 23rd largest U.S. Church
25. Patriarchal Parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church in the USA (9,780)
26. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends
27. Polish National Catholic Church of America (282,411)
28. Presbyterian Church, USA (3,485,332), 8th largest U.S. Church
29. Progressive National Baptist Convention (2,500,000), 11th largest U.S. Church
30. Reformed Church in America (274,521)
31. Serbian Orthodox Church of USA and Canada (67,000)
32. Swedenborgian Church (2,475)
33. Syrian Orthodox Church of Antioch (33,000)
34. Ukranian Orthodox Church of America (5,000)
35. United Church of Christ (1,377,320), 19th largest U.S. Church
36. United Methodist Church (8,340,954), 3rd largest U.S. Church

Amazing how people in religion fail to see, they have to join as a member, but yet have no idea really what they are taking part of, getting themselves registered into the government maincore database. Also know that in the January 1926 issue of the Masonic New Age magazine, members were urged to “cast their lot with the Church, to help vitalize it, liberalize it, modernize it, and render it aggressive and efficient, cause to do less is treason to your country, to your Creator, and to the obligation you have promised to obey.” But yet you the people are not being told this through media, nor are you told that many National Council of Churches or NCC,pastors are Masons. Thus this further proves your religion is under the control and power of Satan, which in the May 22,1989 edition of Time magazine, Dr. Richard Mouw of the Fuller Theological Seminary in California, said that NCC member churches are teaching “magic and the occult and the New Age.” Did you know that the National Council of Churches is responsible for the Revised Standard Version of the Bible? They have concerned themselves with civil liberties, social justice, and the theological critique of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in respect to China and Indo-China. They have said that the United States should become a subordinate of the United Nations, in which they supported the Supreme Court decision that removed prayer and Bible reading from the nation’s public school system.

Then in 1960, a Congressional Committee investigation revealed: “Thus far of the leadership of the National Council of Churches of Christ in America, we have found over 100 persons in leadership capacity with either Communist-front records or records of service to communist causes.” So now you see how the Elite set themselves into position to infiltrate and manipulate religion in America, to thus prepare them for the One World Religion that is coming with their New World Order, now you have been enlightened to the State of the Art, shalom brothers and sisters.