Article 2
Make it imperative on masters to impart religious instruction to their slaves.
FYI: Masters where to make it their duty to influence the slaves religious behaviour towards theirs. So the religious customs and traditions of the Masters, they were to become the slaves as well.
Article 3
Permits the exercise of the Roman Catholics creed only, Every other mode of worship is prohibited.
FYI: This Creed is heavily in affect still within the African Methodist Episcopal Church denomination, which was founded by Richard Allen in 1816 in the United States, after founding its first church in 1794 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In 1799, Allen became the first black Methodist minister, ordained by Bishop Francis Asbury, in recognition of his leadership and preaching. The Roman Catholic Creed is part of reading in the AME Church, the Roman Catholic form of sprinkle baptism is upheld in the AME Church, the Roman Catholic form of Communion is upheld in the AME Church, the Roman Catholic Sunday school lesson pamplets, are upheld in Sunday school classes of the AME Church.
Article 5
SUNDAYS and HOLY-DAYS (HOLIDAYS) are to be strictly observed. All Negroes found at work on these days “are to be confiscated”.
FYI: You see this as well is still in effect, because the majority of blacks worship on Sunday with the rest of their white superiors as was ordained back in 1724. In the 4th century in 364, the Roman Council of Laodicea decided the doctrine of the Christian church and the contents of the Bible. It was at this Council that they outlawed the of keeping the Saturday sabbath, and in the process solemnifying Sunday as the Christian sabbath in (canon 29). So then all religious observances were to be conducted on Sunday, not Saturday. They ruled that Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord's Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians, also decreeing that if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ. So the entire nation was then brought under the subjection of the Roman Catholic Church's religious observance of Sunday. Code still in effect!
Article 7
The ceremonies and forms prescribed by the ordinance of blois and by the edict of 1691, for marriage, shall be observed both with regard to free persons and slaves. But the consent of the father and mother of the slave is not necessary; that of the master shall be the only one required.
FYI: As you read in the bible, the consent of the parents was tradition and custom, but after the initiation of the Christian black codes, slaves no longer had to follow the biblical tradition of marriage, but rather that of their masters. We see this to be evident today with not only blacks, but people in general who have to go before the State to be granted permission to marry, the State is the Master over their marriages.
Article 8
We forbid all curates to process to effect marriages between slaves without the proof of the consent of their master; and we also forbid all masters to force their slaves into marriages against their wills.
FYI: Curate is a person authorized to conduct religious worship, back then he would have also been referred to as a assistant rector or vicar. In the Roman Catholic Church and some other churches, a curate was a cleric who was acting as local representative of a higher ranking member of the clergy. Modern day tense, this would be your pastors in which many of them have not been ordained by the Most High, but rather have been authorized or licensed by the State to act as a representative of the State, but appearing as a man of the Most High God. Still we see this code in affect, because many will not marry people in general, without them having a marriage license from the Master who is now the State.
Article 10
If the husband be a slave, and the wife a free woman, it is our will that their children, of whatever sex they be, shall share the condition of their mother, and be as free as she, notwithstanding the servitude of their father; and if the father be free and the mother a slave, then the children shall be slaves.
FYI: This you see has been transformed into the divorce process of marriages of not only blacks, but all races in general. Understand that in the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a business venture, that is, a for-profit business venture, and as children come into the marriage household, the business venture is considered to have "borne fruit." See what most couples seeking to get married fail to understand, is that children born to the marriage are considered by law as "the contract bearing fruit", meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the law never comes out and says so in so many words. For instance a couple gets married and the wife gets pregnant and nine months later goes into labor to have a son. Now after she has that son, it is going to be recorded that her son was born lets say for example, in Dallas, TX. So what that means, is that her child is the son of the Dallas Municipal court, by way of the State of Texas, thus when she signs for the birth certificate, she waives her right as being the mother of the child, and gives him over to the hospital and the Dallas Municipal court which legally is her child's mother. This is why it is so important for parents to understand two doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s. The first is the Doctrine of Parens Patriae, and the second one is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis. Parens Patriae means literally "the parent of the country", thus secretly is it known that really the State is the actual legal parent.
FYI: So whats unknown to the parent, is that they have no property right in their children, and have custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State. This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their children as long as they don't offend the State, but if they in some manner displease the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take custody and control of its children, thus showing that the parents are only conditional caretakers, now this is the doctrine of In Loco Parentis. The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the State, in which in all honesty, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife, in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract mortgages and debts. They can get car loans, home mortgages, and installment debts in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for-profit business enterprise.
FYI: The marriage contract acquires property through out its existence and over time, it is hoped, increases in value. The marriage contract "bears fruit" by adding children, so if sometime later, the marriage fails, and a "divorce" results the contract continues in existence. The "divorce" is merely a contractual dissolution or amendment of the terms and conditions of the contract. Jurisdiction of the State over the marriage, over the husband and wife, now separated, continues and continues over all aspects of the marriage, over marital property and over children brought into the marriage. That is why family law and the Domestic Relations court calls "divorce" a dissolution of the marriage because the contract continues in operation but in amended or modified form. The marriage license contract is one of the strongest, most binding contractual relationships the State has on people. So pretty much, the couple became married to the State, and anything the two produce while in the marriage becomes the property and control of the State. A marriage license Invokes the Corporate State to be the third party to your union and whatever you conceive is theirs and becomes their offspring (children). That is why they can take away your children at any time at their discretion, in which the State leaves them in your custody and care unless or until they find reason not to. They can put asunder your marriage, because they are the ones who joined you together, by way of their marriage license, not by way of God.
FYI: So if you know anybody or you yourself are married by way of a marriage license, then you need to terminate the contract with the State, based on not having full disclosure at the time of signing. See what most people don't know as well as what I stated above, is that a marriage license contract with the State is as a contract of adhesion as well. What is an adhesion contract, well it is a contract between two disparate, unequal parties, thus making it a flawed contract because of the State's failure to make full disclosure of the terms and conditions. Before the contract can be considered as authentic and binding, the couple must enter into it knowingly, intelligently, intentionally, and with fully informed consent, otherwise, technically there is no contract. See the people are not told and taught this, and the State knows this as well as the government, which is why they try and stick it to the people as if they did know the terms, simply because the fee was paid for the license. Which the State says by paying the fee, implies agreement to be subject to the state's statutes, rules, and regulations and all court cases ruled on related to marriage law, family law, children, and property. So without the people knowing this information, acquiring the license places them in a definite and defined-by-law position inferior and subject to the State. So now do you see how the State is able to pull a fast one over the eyes of the people? Just like the Black Codes of 1724, the children in just about all cases today, go to the mother, and not the father. The male is forced into servitude to pay the State all under the diguise of taking care of his children.
Article 12
We forbid slaves to carry offensive weapons or heavy sticks under the penalty of being whipped, and of having said weapons confiscated for the benefit of the person seizing the same. An exception is made in favor of those slaves who are hunting or are shooting for their masters, and who carry with them a written permission to that effect, or are bring designated by some known mark or badge.
FYI: Daily you see this on the news or read about it in an online news article, where a black person is beat or shot or murdered because they looked liked they had a weapon. The exception for black males to carry a weapon, is never in defense of their own family and people of their community, but rather in defense of America (Master), by joining America's army, then can a black man be seen as a hero and citizen once he puts his life on the line for a country that doesn't care two cents about him. Good Christian Nigger when he can fight and die to protect Master's agenda and rights, but a murderer when he defends his own family from racial profiling. When he comes home from war and takes off that uniform, he is a monkey boy, but when hes at war and laying in the trenches, then he's Master's good christian friend and brother.
Article 13
We forbid slaves belonging to different masters to gather in crowds either by day or by night, under the pretext of a wedding, or for any other cause, either at the dwelling or on the grounds of one of their masters or elsewhere, and less on the highways or in secluded places, under the penalty of corporal punishment, which shall not be less than the whip. In case of frequent offenses of the kind, the offenders shall be branded with the mark of the Flower de Luce, and should there be aggravating circumstances, capital punishment may be applied, at the discretions of the judges. We command all of our subject, be they officials or not, to seize offenders, to arrest and conduct them to prison, although there should be not judgment against them.
FYI: The perpection has been laid, which is that of anytime you see a group or gathering of black people together, violence is sure to follow. The government portrays this propaganda through movies, to instill in the minds of white people that blacks are aggressive when gathered together, and fights always break out if their in a crowd. This then gains them sympathy from middle class Americans and sways them to be in agreement with the breaking up of black crowds. So the police is used to disperse a black crowd gathered peacefully, with violence and dogs and tear gas all because the people are black, but yet its disguise to the public as them being exactly as portrayed through movies. So you end up with blacks being beaten and taken to prison and in some cases, even murdered. Blacks have been so conditioned badly, that its to the point now that when they see a group of black people together, they think the same as their white superiors.
I will be breaking down all the rest and showing how they are still in effect in detail as well, so look for that to come! Shalom