Most people that go to the Bureau department to acquire marriage license, don't come to know the technical, legal and statutory implications of the marriage license. They go because since their youth, they have been trained to follow the law of the land, verses the law of him who created the land. So they in heat, emotionally delusioned, therefore they never know that the marriage license is a three way contract between the State, and the couple to be, in which the State is the principal party or dominant party. Once those licensed are acquired, the State views the union as a privileged business enterprise, meaning that the husband to be and wife to be are merely joined as business partners, not two people under God. See in a secular contract with the State which is what a marriage license is, any reference to God is considered a dotted line, and not officially considered included in the contract at all, because the State regards any mention of God as irrelevant, having no point and meaningless. So if the husband to be and wife to be want to include God as a party in their marriage, that dotted line represents that they will have to add God in their own minds.
A real authentic marriage is a covenant between the husband and wife and the Most High whom is referred to as God, the marriage license is what the State's uses to replace God as being the author and authority over the union of marriage, with itself as being the divine authority. So I'm pretty sure you see how Satanic this contract is, and I assume you can understand why divorce is so high within this nation, because these unions are of the devil. So the husband to be and wife to be apply for a marriage license and think they are entering into a spiritual or religious union of God, not knowing the God they entering into contract with is Satan who's giving power to the State. It was at the Council of Trent in 1563 that the Catholic church made it mandatory for a marriage to be performed by a priest in the presence of two or three witnesses, in which all who didn't marry before a priest or the State in which they resided, were considered to be fornicators and shaking up. In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a business venture, that is, a for-profit business venture, and as children come into the marriage household, the business venture is considered to have "borne fruit."
See what most couples seeking to get married fail to understand, is that children born to the marriage are considered by law as "the contract bearing fruit", meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the law never comes out and says so in so many words. For instance a couple gets married and the wife gets pregnant and nine months later goes into labor to have a son. Now after she has that son, it is going to be recorded that her son was born lets say for example, in Dallas, TX. So what that means, is that her child is the son of the Dallas Municipal court, by way of the State of Texas, thus when she signs for the birth certificate, she waives her right as being the mother of the child, and gives him over to the hospital and the Dallas Municipal court which legally is her child's mother. This is why it is so important for parents to understand two doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s. The first is the Doctrine of Parens Patriae, and the second one is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis. Parens Patriae means literally "the parent of the country", thus secretly is it known that really the State is the actual legal parent.
So whats unknown to the parent, is that they have no property right in their children, and have custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State. This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their children as long as they don't offend the State, but if they in some manner displease the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take custody and control of its children, thus showing that the parents are only conditional caretakers, now this is the doctrine of In Loco Parentis. The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the State, in which in all honesty, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife, in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract mortgages and debts. They can get car loans, home mortgages, and installment debts in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for-profit business enterprise.
The marriage contract acquires property through out its existence and over time, it is hoped, increases in value. The marriage contract "bears fruit" by adding children, so if sometime later, the marriage fails, and a "divorce" results the contract continues in existence. The "divorce" is merely a contractual dissolution or amendment of the terms and conditions of the contract. Jurisdiction of the State over the marriage, over the husband and wife, now separated, continues and continues over all aspects of the marriage, over marital property and over children brought into the marriage. That is why family law and the Domestic Relations court calls "divorce" a dissolution of the marriage because the contract continues in operation but in amended or modified form. The marriage license contract is one of the strongest, most binding contractual relationships the State has on people. So pretty much, the couple became married to the State, and anything the two produce while in the marriage becomes the property and control of the State.
Matthew 19:5 - And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Matthew 19:6 - Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
FYI: According to Black's law Dictionary, 4th edition, it defines marriage license as - A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry." Intermarry, which they were only required for interracial couples who were seeking to marry. The definition of license is - The permission by competent authority to do an act which without such permission, would be illegal." It was illegal for black men to marry white women, despite the Most High who is referred to as God, making it lawful for people to come together. So the government makes something that was lawful to do, illegal, so they can then tell you that if you pay the government money (which is a bribe), then they will turn their backs and give you a permit that allows you to break the law that they just said was illegal to do! So the question that people need to ask themselves, is why would it be illegal to marry without the State's permission?
Now you know why it was illegal because black slaves and white women were having sex with each other and desiring to be married to each other. In North America, laws against interracial marriage and interracial sex existed and were enforced in the Thirteen Colonies from the late seventeenth century onwards, and subsequently in several US states and US territories until 1967. In the United States, miscegenation laws were state laws passed by individual states to prohibit miscegenation, nowadays more commonly referred to as interracial marriage and interracial sex. Typically defining miscegenation as a felony, yes, felony, and these laws prohibited the solemnization of weddings between persons of different races and prohibited the officiating of such ceremonies.
When the government needed finances, some states began allowing interracial marriages or miscegenation as long as those marrying received a license from the state. So in other words, they had to receive permission to do an act which without such permission would have been illegal. Remember, in Black's Law Dictionary it points to this historical fact when it defines "marriage license" as, "A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry." "Intermarry" is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as, "Miscegenation; mixed or interracial marriages." Not long after these licenses were issued, some states began requiring all people who marry to obtain a marriage license, seeing that they could make a profit off of the Union of Marriage. So in 1923, the Federal Government established the Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act (they later established the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act). By 1929, every state in the Union had adopted marriage license laws, and by 1935, all states required licenses except Maryland, which soon followed shortly thereafter.
A marriage license Invokes the Corporate State to be the third party to your union and whatever you conceive is theirs and becomes their offspring (children). That is why they can take away your children at any time at their discretion, in which the State leaves them in your custody and care unless or until they find reason not to. They can put asunder your marriage, because they are the ones who joined you together, by way of their marriage license, not by way of God. So therefore, your union is not of the Most High but rather you replaced him out of your ignorance to the legal aspect of the marriage license, with the State who is operating under the power of Satan who said in Isaiah 14:14 that he will be like the Most High. Which by him using the State to enforce marriage licenses as a requirement for two people to come together, instead of going about marriage according to how the Most High has ordained, he by way of deception gets to be like the Most High as he sits head of the union formatted by the Most High. So if you know anybody or you yourself are married by way of a marriage license, then you need to terminate the contract with the State, based on not having full disclosure at the time of signing.
See what most people don't know as well as what I stated above, is that a marriage license contract with the State is as a contract of adhesion as well. What is an adhesion contract, well it is a contract between two disparate, unequal parties, thus making it a flawed contract because of the State's failure to make full disclosure of the terms and conditions. Before the contract can be considered as authenic and binding, the couple must enter into it knowingly, intelligently, intentionally, and with fully informed consent, otherwise, technically there is no contract. See the people are not told and taught this, and the State knows this as well as the government, which is why they try and stick it to the people as if they did know the terms, simply because the fee was paid for the license. Which the State says by paying the fee, implies agreement to be subject to the state's statutes, rules, and regulations and all court cases ruled on related to marriage law, family law, children, and property. So without the people knowing this information, acquiring the license places them in a definite and defined-by-law position inferior and subject to the State. So now do you see how the State is able to pull a fast one over the eyes of the people?
The people give wedding rings not because its biblical, but because Pope Gregory decreed that as a required statement of nuptial intent, the groom to be had to give his intended or potential spouse an engagement ring to solidify his intent on marrying his spouse. He also decreed that the ring in which the groom must give had to be of gold to signify financial sacrifice, in which the giving of wedding rings comes from paganism, it originated in Babylon. The most ancient ring discovered there is in the shape of the eternal serpent, in which the image of the serpent biting its tail to form the circle of the ring is an ancient satanic symbol.
Question: What did the Most High say a man should do before he get married?
Genesis 2:24 - Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
FYI: Where in the scripture did the Most High say, therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall put a ring on his intended or potential spouse's finger, and they shall be one flesh? Where in the scripture did the Most High say, therefore shall a man leave his father and mother and apply for a marriage license, and seek out a church to be married in and a preacher to do the wedding, and then shall he and his wife be one flesh? Nowhere, that wasn't his decree for a man and woman to come together, man instituted that doctrine and belief and tried to pass it off as the godly thing to do. Why, because a ring is made out of gold and silver, which are highly valuable and marketable. So if a man is required to purchase a ring in order to show he's engaged or married, then there is a profit to be made off of the union of marriage thus being a for profit business as the State deems it to be in a Secular Contract. Man according to his own understanding, came up with the idea of giving rings as a sign, which in doing this has made the people idolatry worshippers because they worship that which is made by the hands of men. So I hope this gives you a clearer understanding on marriage licenses, if you need further understanding please feel free to hit up my inbox, shalom.
