The New World Order Within The Inception Of Education (Time To Show What Time It Is)

Before the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching was established in 1905, education was already being taught, such as the real Liberal Arts education. Then the Elite set John Dewey up to become the "father of progressive education", to establish a system that would work toward transformation of all practical instrumentalities of education till they were in harmony with their ideas. John Dewey felt the people needed to be shaped for the needs of this age, which was the coming enactment of their Aquarius age, thus their New World Order. Then in 1934 the National Education Association former Executive Secretary Willard Givens, leaked that education was established for the people to be subjected to a large degree of social control, with the major function of the school is the social orientation of the individual, and that it must seek to give the people understanding of the transition to a new Social Order.

This is why education was established, then also did Givens leak that in order to sell college off to the masses, that they must believe they are less of a person without a good sound quality furtherance of Education. Then you fastforward to 1946, where you have Canadian psychiatrist and World War II General Brock Chisholm, who was the M.D. head of the World Health Organization (WHO), who through his Mastery Learning book in Chapter 3 and Chapter 7, promoted the behavior modification processes of children, starting with controlling the family. He stated:

"it has long been generally accepted that parents have perfect right to impose any points of view, any lies or fears, superstitions, prejudices, hates, or faith on their defenseless children. It is, however, only recently that it has become a matter of certain knowledge that these things cause neuroses"

FYI: Educating your own child he claims causes neuroses, this guy believes that parents are doing their kids an injustice, whether it be imposing any point of view or faith. But what is key here, is that he said "defenseless children", which is inserting that another needs to step in for the defense of children and speak on whats best for them, other than the parents, did you catch that? Then he went on to say:

"For the very survival of the human race, world understanding, tolerance and forbearance have become absolutely essential. We must be prepared to sacrifice much.... Whatever the cost, we must learn to live in friendliness and peace... . putting aside the mistaken old ways of our elders if that is possible. If it cannot be done gently, it may have to be done roughly or even violently".

FYI: What he was talking about being prepared to sacrifice, was parents having control of imposing any view point or family faith upon their children for the better good of society. He is saying they need to focus on the survival of the human race, which this coincides with his whole belief in de-population of the earth siting its too over crowded. Shifting the people right into a New World Order through the medium of Education, asking to put aside the "mistaken" old ways of our elders if that is possible. Hold on a minute, this doesn't apply to so called "Blacks or African Americans", because your elders are not the same as Europeans, which goes to show you their Education system was never meant for you. Not forgetting the fact you were not segegrated during this time, you were classifed as niggers, so he is really saying that his people need to forsake family tradition which is derived from the elders of a family, either gently or it may have to be done roughly or even violently if they don't. Then to further shed light onto the true Agenda of the National Education Association, and editorial in the "Chicago Sun" in 1962 gave an insightful glimpse into the NEA's plan and power, to which it stated:

"For control--real control over the Nation's children--is being shifted rapidly to the NEA. That organization has about completed the job of cartelizing public school education under its own cartel... It is extending that control over colleges and universities. In the NEA scheme of things it will be a simple matter to extend control over whatever Washington agency handles the funds."

FYI: Then 3 years later in 1965, The U.S. Congress magically passed the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Then  months later, it decided to fund Citizens for the 21st Century, a book by UCLA Professor John Goodlad, who wrote,

"Although the conduct of education and especially the clientele have changed.... the school is perceived very much as it was then: a partitioned box where boys and girls come to sit still for six hours a day and to be told about some fragmentary pieces of "knowledge" thought to reflect the rudiments of their "culture." This image must be shattered, violently if necessary -- and forever. The future of mankind may rest upon it".

The NEA is the National Education Association, and the ASCD is the curriculm branch of the NEA, which ASCD stands for Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. In 1970, this same curriculm branch of the NEA, published "To Nurture Humaneness: Commitment for the 70's, and released this visionary statement for the coming times which we find the education system to be in presently, saying:

The old order is passing.... The controls of the past were sacred.... Social controls cannot be left to blind chance and unplanned change -- usually attributed to God. Man must be the builder of new forms of social organizations.... Here education must play a stellar role. (Dan W. Dodson, Professor of Educational Sociology at N. Y. University)

FYI: The old order is passing, which is the religious way of family tradition being considered a sacred union were the people are controlled by the reigns of God, and thus follow their faith in him as a way to guide their homes and children. These pirates call this a form of social control left to blind faith which he calls chance, then implied it as being unplanned, as in meaning the practice of faith and having hope, hope is considered not planned, its something the people are waiting for, which he just used the word "change" in place of the word hope, which he shows by stating usually attributed to God. Then he says Man must be the builder of new forms of social organizations, and showed this is possible to happen, with Education playing a stellar role. How much more information do you need folks, this is further proof of why Education was instituted into curriculm form. Its all a setup of a larger plot of the Bankers to lead you the people towards a One World Social Order. What else was stated in their visionary statement:

"The school will need to be supplemented by neighborhood family centers which provide infant care and developmental activity.... Education may well begin at birth in cooperative family centers. (Francis Chase, Professor Emeritus of the University of Chicago)"

FYI: As I always tell you, study their language and you can decipher every word, look at how pretty this was said, seem harmless right? The school which has taken on the role as Parents, will need to be supplemented, in which supplemented means something added to supply a deficiency, in which deficiency means the state of needing something that is absent or unavailabe. So if the school has taken on the role as Parents of the children, then that role specifically deals with the imposing of views and faiths and morals an values and beliefs the school feels, not the parents, but what the school feels the child should have. So to compliment the instructional aspect of parenting, you also need the caring and nurturing nature of that a mother gives. These neighborhood family centers which provide infant care and developmental activity that their vision statement is talking about, is really the institution of Daycare Centers. What makes the education be cooperative in family centers which we know are Daycares, is if the parents go along with allowing them to aide for their children as they should, begin at birth, is showing the age range acceptance of infants into Daycares. Can you not see how they plotted everything? What else was said in their visionary statement:

"Many daily decisions and value judgments now made by the individual will soon be made for him... How to plan for one's children's education will be partially taken out of his hands. (John Loughary, Professor of Education at the University of Oregon".

FYI: Wow, remember how we learned earlier that the Canadian clown claimed that educating your own child causes neuroses, and how he believes that parents are doing their kids an injustice, whether it be imposing any point of view upon them, or faith, remember that? Remember how I said what is key in his statement, is that he said "defenseless children", which saying that, he was inserting that another needs to step in for the defense of children and speak on whats best for them, other than the parents, remember that? Now you see here how his belief was instrumented or weaved into this visionary statement, cause now you see how the schools were setup to take the role of the Parent in instructing and imposing views and faith upon the children, and how the care and nurturing of them would be the new responsibility of the Daycare Centers, not the parents.

FYI: This is the real reason why they had to bring about the Women Liberation Movement, to take the woman out of the house, from instructing and caring and nurturing her children, to deceive her into having all the same things as a man, no different than the Serpent beguilding Eve in the garden, so that they could tax the woman now with the man and make money off of the whole population, as where before it was just the man, and force the woman into working long hours, that would at least give them the chance to institute their Educational and Daycaring agenda for their New World Social Order. As you see today, many daily decisions and value judgments are being made for the children in schools, and how now they have school counselors and advisors to plan for your children's education, thus taking that out of the hands of the parents. To which the visionary statement goes on to say:

"Vital questions of values, beliefs, feelings, emotions and human interrelationships in all forms must be integral parts of the curriculum". (Arthur Combs, Professor of Education at the University of Florida)

FYI: So the same thing they said the parents were imposing, that caused neuroses, are the very same things the National Education Association of the Elite Bankers, had instituted by the branch within then known as the ASCD, to become now the same things integrated into school curriculum. Thus showing you they were lying when they said it caused neuroses, using it as a scare to cause Europeans to subject to their Social Order of Education, and enroll their children in their schools to be better Parented, and into their Daycares to be better Cared and Nurtured for, thus taking control over the Family as designed. We could also fastforward to 1976, where Harold Shane the Project Director for the NEA Bicentennial Committee, made a statement that characterize the Outcome based Education today, to which he stated:

"Rather than adding my voice to those who urge us to go "back to the basics," I would argue that we need to move ahead to new basics... Certainly, cross-cultural understanding and empathy have become fundamental skills of human relations and intercultural rapport... the arts of compromise and reconciliation, of consensus building, and of planning for interdependence, a command of these talents becomes "basics"... As young people mature, we must help them develop... a service ethic which is geared toward the real world... the global servant concept in which we will educate our young for planetary service and eventually for some form of world citizenship".

FYI: To those who urge us to go back to family religious traditions, I would argue that we need to accept the New Social Order, but did you see how he carefully used his words to not say that directly? What was key most in his statement, was that he said as young people mature, "We", who is this "We" if the parents have been taken out of the equation? "We" must help them develop, a service ethic, translation "serving occupation custom to moral principles", which again I ask you who's moral principles if the parents were taken out of the equation because their moral principles were considered to cause neuroses? Serving occupation is a servitude position for a slave, he knows as well as the Elite knows, that's what the people are going to school to really become, slaves serving them in a field of the theirs which requires the moral principles of world citizenship, which is a New World Social Order, in order for them to work in their coming Global System. So their basically conditioning and positioning the children and the young people through Education, in order to know how to conduct themselves and be fit to use their education to follow command in their New World Order.

FYI: The skills they develop in school, are whats considered to be their talents, which is what they get hired by a company for when they graduate, which doesn't happen until after they have completed the degree process curriculms of becoming SOMEBODY. Their hired by a company based on the skills they have acquired in a particular field, in which males usually by the old basics, would take on the occupation of their fathers, as well as females would take on the occupation of their mothers, but now they have been taken out of a family constructed environment, and institutionalized into a industrial prison complex that houses them from 4 to 8 years while their doing time, in which while doing time, like a prisoner, they learn a trade. In which this trade is what gets them a susposedly better paying job, after they have developed the necessary skills that would become unto them as a talent. But wait a minute now, this they do from 4 to 8 years right, and didn't these Pirates call the form of social control left to blind chance (faith) as being unplanned?

FYI: Yes indeed, then they implied it as being unplanned, as in meaning the practice of faith and having hope, to which hope is considered not planned, and something the people are waiting for, to which they used the word "change" in place of the word hope, remember? Which this was shown by him stating usually attributed to God, remember? Then riddle me this, is not going to school for 4 to 8 years for something you don't see or have yet, but yet you believe its possible to achieve, is that not faith? Then if that is faith, and the belief is that Man must be the builder of new forms of social organizations, with Education as playing the Stellar role, then wouldn't that make the signature of Man the God who controls the faith of what their going to school for 4 to 8 years for? Cause their not waiting on approval of God, but rather the curriculm of Man Social Organization process to achieve a degree, in order to become somebody with skills that qualify them for a job with better pay? Thus showing MONEY as the root evil of Education. Shalom