Declaration of Indigenous Independence

Answering email questions, the main one I was flooded with, was how do I change my name legally, without going to the System, below I answer that question as well as address other ones.

Notify your doctor's office that you were recently married, then give them your new name, as well as do this with your telephone or cell phone provider, as well as with at least one utility company whether it be the company who service your lights, or the company who service your water. Understand that when you receive mail, you are receiving it from the Postal Service, which is under Federal Statues. Therefore, the mailing content is classified as federal documents which are being delivered unto legal entities and corporations. So what that means, is that your new name is thus classified as a legal entity upon acceptance of your mail in that name, this is one form of Common Law Usage. They will never tell you that, because its not in their best interest if property ever corrected their name, because no tax can accrued off of one who is not property. So without our people knowing this, they hold to their European surnames for dear life, and will argue you down as a supposedly African American, that their African, but yet also European.

You can change your name without ever making an application to any court or needing a court's authorization, simply pick a name you want to answer to, correct or change to, and then proceed to use that chosen name over and over again, thus making it common usage, on a consistent and prolonged basis. That chosen name will be just as legal and true, providing the purpose behind the change is no way illegal, criminal or fraudulent, and is not occasioned by an intent to avoid a legitimate obligation or to interfere with the rights of others. Our people have no idea, that the United Nations addressed the "nom de guerre" problem of politically -imposed misnomers. The Resolutions 217 and 1386 addressed the common Colonial-initiated violation of placing their names upon the natural, indigenous people for the purpose of making colorable claims.

The Declaration of The Rights of The Child (Article III of Resolution 1386)

Principle III

Every Child shall be entitled, from his birth, to a name and a nationality.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 15 - United Nations General Assembly - December 10,1948)

Article 15

(1). Everyone has the right to a nationality.

(2). No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

So once you changed or corrected your name, then by Common Law method, it is your legal and lawful name, with absolute competence and rightfully assumed in all respects. Such a self-chosen name is a correct action and legitimate in its own right, and does not suffer from "want" of a court order. Understand that "original jurisdiction" does not reside with the courts, a court order (corporate) is a revenue raising opportunity and affirmation option, instituted by the State. Why? It was done so for raising revenues by placing a court "fee" on a pre-existing "right" which already resides, inalienably, with the Natural Person. When one seeks a court order for a name correction, it only acts as a formal confirmation of what already is right and fact, and also gives or transfers, to the officers of the court, a jurisdiction in a private, Common Law matter that is already confirmed as a right, sufficient, and not a mere privilege. Our people don't know this because their so called Religious Leaders and National Leaders, do not enlighten them, due to their lack of knowledge.

So therefore, our people do not know the difference between a "right", and that of a conditional, and "taxable privilege". Which is why they sign forms like Marriage Licenses, 1040 and W4 Authorization, never realizing that they have been coerced into trick contract sanctions and orders. The State and Government know this, why do you think they have to give you these deceptive contracts as documents, in order for you to sign? If your getting married, then why do you need to sign a contract with the State, if the marriage is between you and your spouse? They know they can't just take your Inalienable right to drive or marry, without you willfully signing to give up your "Right" and be subjected to their limited jurisdiction. So they give you these deceptively issued forms, to declare a "Right" as a "Privilege" condition, and these forms are deemed to supersede your "Right". So by this, they have managed to accomplish converting your Constitutional secured "Right", into now a Corporate and Taxable "Privilege", in which this is yet another bureaucratically induced deception that has been executed without the people's free will or knowledgeable and involved agreement.

Rights:

Rights are natural states of being, whether recognized or unrecognized, that all humans inherently possess. (For example, the right to procreate or grow food is obvious, but not necessarily recognized by documentation.) Some rights are recognized in the U.S. Constitution, such as the right to travel and marry. Rights are nullified when they are exchanged for privileges, such as when one enters into a contract with the state through a marriage or drivers license. When natural rights are exchanged for privileges granted from an outside source, one becomes a non-sovereign, or a subject of the authority who has given the privilege.

Privilege:

A privilege is permission - granted by a higher authority to carry out an activity. When gaining a privilege, one must often give up a natural right. Example: According to the U.S. Constitution, people have a right to travel public roads in their private vehicles. However, when they enter into a contract with the state to receive a drivers license, they exchange their constitutional right to travel for a state-granted privilege to drive, and are thus subject to the stipulations of the state (auto insurance, realm of integral registration, etc.).

Civil Law:

Civil law is the structure that organizes, controls, punishes and rewards individuals who have given up their rights in exchange for privileges.

Common Law:

Common law, a law of sovereigns, is based on the idea of self-responsibility and natural rights. It is recognized under the Constitution as being the natural state of being.

So now you should understand the difference between a "Right" and a "Privilege", and should also know that one is made cognizant of the fact that the Inalienable Rights of the people supersedes the governments erected by the people. Government is subordinate to the people, and should always be viewed from that perspective, they are obligated to secure the People in their Inalienable Rights, their property and their efforts. Therefore, the "court method" of corroborating a "name correction and change", is not to be assumed as being necessary nor superior, but merely a formalized method of confirming or acknowledging a person's right to a name correction and change. The same name change status could just as simply have been assumed or changed by the natural person by his or her merely using that name on a repeated and prolonged basis. As in the case of couples together who are desiring to change their name to reflect their marriage, this applies as well. When you transact business, use your new name, make it publicly known that you are married, and conduct yourselves as such, you do not need a court order either for a name correction nor need their license (permission) to be married.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 16 - United Nations General Assembly - December 10,1948)

Article 16.

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or

religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal

rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending

spouses.

(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled

to protection by society and the State.

Men and women of full age, "have the right to marry and to found a family", did you read in this Declaration as your Human Right, which is your God given right to marry and have a family? So if it is your natural right to marry, then in order for it to be made a privilege, to where you have to seek permission from the State, you must do what? Simple, you must give up your natural right, which goes to show you, the State has no right to decide if you can marry or not, it really needs your permission to act as authority or God over your union as itself being the one who established it, by your signature on its contract papers. So you marrying by the State, makes your marriage of the State, not of God, and the preacher who says by the power invested in me by God, is lying also, his power was granted unto him by the State, who he is claiming as his God but don't know it. See how they make a monkey fool out of you? The declaration stated also saying "full consent of the intending spouses", thus further letting you know, you don't need the permission of the State to enter into marriage. What the State protects, is your family's Inalienable Rights, property and your efforts, but when you sign their contract for a marriage license, you just reversed this Declaration, and gave them your family's Inalienable Rights, property and efforts, and Ward-ship over your children.

Notice also it said "without any limitation due to race", because the "marriage license" was instituted for the "Black Slaves" who wanted to marry "White Women", in which the United Nations was correcting that violation. Miscegenation laws, were laws that banned interracial marriage and sometimes interracial sex between whites and blacks. In the United States, interracial marriage, cohabitation and sex have since 1863 been termed as "miscegenation. In North America, laws against interracial marriage and interracial sex existed and were enforced in the Thirteen Colonies from the late seventeenth century onwards, and subsequently in several US states and US territories until 1967. In the United States, miscegenation laws were state laws passed by individual states to prohibit miscegenation, nowadays more commonly referred to as interracial marriage and interracial sex. Typically defining miscegenation as a felony, yes, felony, and these laws prohibited the solemnization of weddings between persons of different races and prohibited the officiating of such ceremonies. So now you should understand as to why they said "without any limitation due to race".

Isn't it amazing, how you know you have the Right to vote, but don't know your Rights to anything else? Let me show you something else, because if you read any of my other notes, you know that I done showed that you so called Blacks and Latinos and Coloreds and so forth, are the real Aboriginal people of this North American Continent. So anybody you here bumping that Jerusalem talk, have been clearly deceived by the reconstructing of ancient scripts by the hands of the Roman Inquisition and Crusade policy. You will hear all these so called Black Hebrew Israelite Camps telling you about the King Alfred Plan, teaching you that you only came to America by way of cargo slave-ships only, and your not from America, but rather Jerusalem, did you know that same King Alfred Plan condemned their teaching? See what they don't know, because they have no in-depth knowledge of ancient law and modern day law of the land, is that the King Alfred Plan listed out Executive Orders, let me show you something below:

Excerpts: King Alfred Plan: Executive Order #11490:

Note: Attorney General:

At the appropriate time, to be designated by the President, the leaders of some of these organizations are to be detained ONLY WHEN IT IS CLEAR THAT THEY CANNOT PREVENT THE EMERGENCY, working with local public officials during the first critical hours. All other leaders are to be detained at once. Compiled lists of Minority leaders have been readied at the National Data Computer Center. It is necessary to use the Minority leaders designated by the President in much the same manner in which we use Minority members who are agents with Central and Federal, and we cannot, until there is no alternative, reveal King Alfred in all its aspects. Minority members of Congress will be unseated at once. This move is not without precedent in American history.

Attorney General

Preliminary Memo: Department of Defense

This memo is being submitted in lieu of a full report from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. That report is now in preparation. There will be many cities where the Minority will be able to put into the street a superior number of people with a desperate and dangerous will. He will be a formidable enemy, for he is bound to the Continent by heritage and knows that political asylum will not be available to him in other countries. The greatest concentration of the Minority is in the Deep South, the Eastern seaboard, the Great lakes region and the West Coast.

Did you catch what was said? "He will be a formidable enemy, for he is bound to the Continent by heritage and knows that political asylum will not be available to him in other countries." Key phrase here is: "for he is bound to the Continent by heritage", in which that continent brothers and sisters, is North America. Heritage means property that descends to an Heir, something that is transmitted by, or acquired from, a predecessor: Legacy. So the real reason these Europeans want to kill you and enact this King Alfred Plan which has been disguised now since more of our people are becoming conscious to it, as the Homeland Security Act, is because you are the rightful heirs of this North American Continent. Europeans were of British decent were not even called Americans until 1641 my people. They telling you to go back to Africa in one breath,while knowing what is now known as North America, was once Northwest Africa, which is how they easily label you African and American (African American), because Africa was America when the continents were all one. So now you should see why with all this so called change that so called Black People have supposedly on paper received, they really haven't gained nothing because their under European Surnames. Which you now know why, because as admitted in the "Plan", they are bound to the Continent by Heritage". Understand that, in order to obtain your inheritance left unto you by your Fore Fathers, such as Nationality and Heritage, your birthrights had to be taken from you through a form of contract, without your consent.

So your name had to be disconnected from your Fore Fathers, and linked to the name of those who had not rights to your Nationality and Heritage, in order to state claim to it as being theirs, by denoting ownership or possession of the Rightful Heir, as being their property. In a sense, making the person who is not the Rightful Heir, your adoptive guardian, which this is a deception that was deliberately practiced upon the Aboriginal Natural and Indigenous Real Americans, in order for the Europeans to secure, unfair and unlawful gain to something that was not theirs, such as the land of the slaves and all the minerals and so forth, and their Heritage. By renaming you to claim you as property of theirs, denationalized you to be subjective unto Civil Rights with privileges, because as property, you don't have Human Rights, your considered lower than animal, better yet 3/5 of a Compromise. This is why you were marching during the 50 and 60s for Civil Rights, which the Europeans loved, because they give you those, and what they give, they can take, and they loved it, because they were not marching for Human Rights. Our people were marching for to be citizens of what was already theirs by Heritage, America. So by you still having the last name of who owned your ancestors, the name becomes a indicator of ownership, thus keeping you as property without Rights like cattle, cause they have branded you with tags such as: Negro, blacks, coloreds, Nigger, African American, West Indians, Mexicans, Latinos. Shalom