We are living in a backwards society, in this nation the powers that be operate off of the root of all evil instead of rooting out all evil. So therefore, things that are set in order tend to get amended when the right amount of money is put forth. This is no different when it comes to the understanding of biblical matters. The number one most hated servant of the Most High written of in the bible, is Apostle Paul. Poor Paul, the man dead and gone and they still talking about him and lying on him, so lets clear some things up in regards to the Apostle Paul.
Question: What happen when Saul was on his way to Damascus?
Acts 9:3 - And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:
Acts 9:4 - And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
FYI: So Saul received authority from the chief priests, to go into Damascus and persecute more people of the Christ. While on his way, a light from heaven shined around him, blinding him, thus causing him to fall to the earth. Then he heard a voice saying unto him why do you persecute?
Question: So what else?
Acts 9:5 - And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
Acts 9:6 - And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.
FYI: So the voice identified himself as Christ, and Saul asked him what he had to do with him? So here Saul is getting his first order from Christ, in which Christ instructs him to arise and go into the city, and it shall be told unto him what he must do.
Question: So what happened when Saul arised?
Acts 9:8 - And Saul arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man: but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus.
Acts 9:9 - And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink.
FYI: Saul arose and he saw no man, why, because his eyes were blinded after beholding the brightness of the light. So after having his vision taken from him, he had to be led helpless into the city by the hands of the men that came with him. So he was blinded for three days and in those three days, he didn't eat or drink anything, he was in total darkness in a state of fasting.
Question: So what else happened next?
Acts 9:10 - And there was a certain disciple at Damascus, named Ananias; and to him said the Lord in a vision, Ananias. And he said, Behold, I am here, Lord.
Acts 9:11 - And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the street which is called Straight, and enquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth,
Acts 9:12 - And hath seen in a vision a man named Ananias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his sight.
FYI: So Ananias was sent by revelation from Christ to go unto Saul, in which Christ told him to arise and go into the street which is called Straight. This street ran in a direct line from gate to gate, and from east and west. Ananias was told to inquire at the house of Judas for a man called Saul, from Tarsus, in which Tarsus was the capital of the province of Cilicia, lying along the northeast coast of the Mediterranean. Here, he let him know that he would find Saul praying, in which by him telling him that, he was giving him assurance that he would be openly received by Saul, and letting him know that Saul in his prayer, received the vision that he was to come unto him and place his hands upon him that he might receive back his sight.
Question: So what happened after this?
Acts 9:13 - Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem:
Acts 9:14 - And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name.
FYI: Ananias like many would have been, he wasn't so sure about this, which is why he answered in a fearful like manner. He was like Lord, I have heard from many people about this man, and about all the evils and harm he has done to your saints in Jerusalem. Now, he has come here to Damascus having been granted authority from the chief priests, to put anyone who calls upon your name in prison. So Ananias was fearful, lets say a guy from a town away from you was known for murdering people, and getting away with it. And your town is throwing a midnight party fest, and the guy from a town away doesn't have a ride to get to the party, and your friends instruct you that you are to go and pick him up. You going to be looking terrified like are you serious, have yall not heard about this man, he be killing people, well that's how Ananias was feeling in regards to going unto Saul.
Question: So what did Christ say unto Ananias?
Acts 9:15 - But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
FYI: So Christ let Ananias know, that this man Saul will be my chosen instrument to testify of me, and bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel. The Apostle bore witness of Christ before Roman rulers, and before King Agrippa and the emperor Nero in which it was the Kings who granted him authority to destroy before all the people who bore witness of Christ name. So now upon being converted, the Apostle Paul had to go back before those same people whom granted him authority, and now be seen bearing witness of the same name in which he used to persecute people for witnessing about. So as you can see, the Apostle Paul was called by Christ himself he didn't attend seminary school to become an Apostle.
Question: So what kind of instrument would the Apostle Paul be used for?
Acts 26:16 - But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;
FYI: See here the Apostle Paul is recalling the revelations Christ showed unto him and the things he spoke unto him. In this revealing, Christ gives him the reason or purpose as to why he chose him, in which he says he did so to make him a minister and witness, both of these things which he has seen, and of the things in which he will reveal unto him. So before he ever became an Apostle, Christ had already chosen him for this work. So he was made an Apostle not by going to theologian seminary school, but by divine power, and by him being chosen while yet he was still in his sins, is showing the grace of the forgiveness of sins that the Most High promised unto his people would come by way of his Son. So just as Apostle Paul was turned away from darkness into the marvelous light, he now can do the same unto a people which sitteth in darkness. Back in Isaiah 49:6 it is prophesied that Christ would be a light unto the Gentiles, and through the Apostle Paul would this take place, because upon Apostle Paul Christ put the work of him bearing his name unto the Gentiles. So as you can see, it is undeniable that Christ himself chose the Apostle Paul to be a minister and a witness of his.
Question: How did Paul become an Apostle?
Galatians 1:1 - Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)
FYI: Paul was an Apostle, sent not from men not by man, but from Christ himself and the Most High, whom raised him from the dead. So here he is showing who is the author of the ministry generally, and that whether they are apostles or shepherds or ministers or witnesses or teachers, all are in agreement as to their calling because they are all appointed by the Most High himself. So this again rules out your theologian seminary school preachers. What some fail to understand is that, this epistle was written on account of the disturbance made among the churches of Galatia by false teachers. These teachers sought to prepare a way for their doctrines by discrediting Paul. If they admitted that he was an apostle at all, they claimed that he was inferior to Peter and the Twelve, and that he had received his gospel from them, and hence all must look to Jerusalem for the true gospel. So this is why the Apostle Paul begins by declaring that his apostleship is not from man, but by Christ, directly from Christ. He is letting it be known that the other apostles did not convert, choose, or appoint him, but Christ came from heaven to commission him. So even back then the Apostle Paul had to deal with people hating on him and trying to discredit him and claim that he is false, just like so many who are ignorant in understanding try and accomplish doing today.
Question: What made the Apostle Paul different than the false teachers?
Romans 9:1 - I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,
FYI: The Apostle Paul was regarded as a traitor to his race, and as one not having the best interests of his people. So his own people tried to discredit him and accuse him of being a false. So this is why the Apostle Paul said I speak the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience testifies with me in the Kodesh (holy) spirit. So I show you this so that you can see even back then as those ignorant of Apostle's Paul mission given unto him directly from Christ, were speaking against Paul and claiming he was a liar and false. Which goes to show you, ain't nothing new under the sun.
Question: What happened when the Apostle Paul went up to Jerusalem?
Galatians 2:1 - Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.
Galatians 2:2 - And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.
FYI: So the Apostle Paul is saying here, that he didn't go up by command to Jerusalem, he went by revelation from Christ. Then he says he informed them of the things which he had taught unto the Gentiles, but he did this in private to those who were of reputation such as Peter or James, why, for fear that he might be running or had run in vain. Paul didn't doubt what he was teaching, but because there were certain reports and false accusations being spread around about him, he went unto them privately so that no cause of hindrance to the gospel would present itself.
Question: What else happened?
Galatians 2:3 - But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:
Galatians 2:4 - And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:
FYI: The false brethren were claiming that Apostle Paul was running in vain, because Titus who was a Greek, which is considered the uncircumcised Gentile believers, was not circumcised upon conversion. So the false brothers wanted Titus and Gentile converts to be circumcised, but the Apostle Paul refused it to be so. This matter arose because some false brothers had infiltrated their ministry, to learn about the freedom or the in-dependency Christ had given him, in hopes of finding a way to control them, and subject Gentile converts to the bondage of the law.
Galatians 2:5 - To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.
FYI: Paul sternly opposed their demands in order to preserve the truth of the gospel among the Gentiles. The motive of his firmness was to make the future of the gospel safe and uncorrupted by false brothers. Had he would have yielded a jot, then advantage would have been taken of it. The real Apostles such as Peter and the rest, were in agreement with the teachings of the Apostle Paul.
Question: What did Peter say in regards to the Apostle Paul?
2 Peter 3:15 - And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
FYI: If Paul was so false as people are claiming, then how come Peter addressed him as their beloved brother? Why didn't Peter say o yeah, those false brothers were right about one thing, the Apostle Paul was not called by Christ, he is a false prophet? Peter came right back praised the teachings of Apostle Paul, in which he said the wisdom in which was given unto him, he used in his writings to you. And we now know that Christ himself chose the Apostle Paul to be a minister and a witness according to Acts 26:16. We also know that Christ said he would be a minister and a witness of the things which he has seen, and the things in which he would reveal unto him. So because his revelations and teachings came directly from Christ himself, everything he would preach and bear witness of, Christ showed it to him. So therefore when he spoke, he was speaking pure truth in Christ, because Christ was revealing to him what to say, and since Christ is not a liar, therefore what Apostle Paul was saying was not lie as he stated in Romans 9:1. Now having this understanding, this gets real tight because one of the most talked about subjects today in regards to the Apostle Paul, is women teaching. But before we get into that, lets see what else did Peter say in regards to the teachings of Apostle Paul.
Question: So what else did Peter say?
2 Peter 3:16 - As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
FYI: So Peter bore record that Apostle Paul spoke according to the wisdom that was given unto him, in which we know Christ revealed the things the Apostle taught, unto him. Peter didn't have no problem with the Apostle Paul when he corrected him, he bore witness that Paul spoke divine wisdom. So therefore with most of the Jews being carnal minded, they couldn't understand the Apostle Paul's stance concerning such things of the law, and the man of sin being revealed, and the earth passing away, and the Second Coming of Christ. So instead of having the heart and mind to take time and listen with the intent upon getting understanding, they spoke against him and tried to discredit him as some do unto this day. When you operating in a carnal mind and trying to understand spiritual matters, your not going to be able to comprehend properly as you should had you been spiritual minded. So Peter was letting them know the Apostle Paul writes the same way in all his letters, thus giving off the notion that ain't no contradiction in what he is teaching.
FYI: Having read his epistles, Peter was like yeah and in them contain some things that are hard to understand. Which they that are not taught of the Most High and his laws and statutes and commandments, and those that are not yet established in what they have learned, but yet are shaken by every difficult thing they read, which in perverting what the Apostle Paul has said, by giving their own interpretation of what the Apostle Paul written by formatting a belief that was never meant, as they not only do with Apostle Paul's epistles, but also with the scriptures. They do these things for ill to their own understanding thus leading to their own destruction. So folks who do such a thing, will and shall be destroyed upon judgment day. What is the Most High going to do? Romans 2:16 - In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel. So all who don't believe in Apostle Paul's teachings and despise them and discredit them and label him as false and a liar and add new meanings or your own interpretations to what he said, you still going to be judged by the Most High according to the wisdom which Christ gave unto Apostle Paul. So again I say as I said before, now having this understanding, this gets real tight because one of the most talked about subjects today in regards to the Apostle Paul, is women teaching.
Question: What did Apostle say in regards to a woman teaching?
1 Timothy 2:12 - But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
FYI: In 2 Peter 3:15 Peter said that the Apostle taught according to the wisdom that was given unto him, and in Acts and Galatians we learn that Christ chose him and revealed wisdom unto him. So the first thing that must be understood here is that the things Apostle Paul is speaking has been revealed unto him by Christ. So its not the Apostle's Paul order for a woman not to teach, but Christ's order and commandment. So all this putting the blame on Paul stuff, you better watch yourself because Christ chose Apostle Paul himself to be a minister and a witness, so he witnessing the things Christ has shown him, in which Peter testifies that only those who are ignorant and unlearned and unstable have a problem with the teachings of Paul. Now the precept says "but I suffer not, which means I do not permit I do not allow". So one must know that the Apostle Paul spoke this under divine inspiration from Christ himself whom on the road to Damascus he addressed as Lord. So upon reading here in this precept when it says "I", you must understand that the "I" is in reference to Christ himself. How so, because man doesn't have the power to suffer not a woman to teach, Christ who is the head of man has that power, and through man he can exemplify that power. Which is why in 1 Corinthians 14:37 the Apostle Paul said - If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. See again here you see the word "I", which now you know its not in reference to Paul himself but Christ, which is why he said the things I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord, which is whom chose Apostle Paul. So when he said Let your women keep silence in the church, and I suffer not a woman to teach, that's not his order but instead the commandment of the Lord. So lets go back to 1 Timothy 2:12.
Question: What did Apostle say in regards to a woman teaching?
1 Timothy 2:12 - But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
FYI: When you suffer not something, that means you don't permit something or you don't allow something, and the issue which is being suffer not is in regards to a woman teaching the bible. So if a woman is not allowed to teach the word of the Most High, then how can she post scriptures, if teach means to impart skills or knowledge to or provide knowledge of something and to instruct in? If you impart skills or knowledge to someone, your teaching them, if you instruct someone your teaching them, so again how is a woman not teaching if she is posting scripture? How is a woman not teaching when she is taking the bible reading some verses and then telling what the verses mean? This is Christ's order and commandment, not the Apostle Paul's. We have some brothers who are teaching that this precept means that women are not to teach men or have spiritual authority over men because Eve was deceived, in which they are right to an extent, but they missing a key piece. See they see where it says nor to usurp authority over the man, and take that as saying see she can't teach a man, when that is not what the precept is saying.
FYI: This is where they error, because it said I suffer not a woman to teach, it didn't say I suffer not a woman to teach usurp authority over the man. They miss the coma in between teach and nor, the coma is added in a spot of text as a form of dividing when showing a separation. The word nor is a conjuction and adverb meaning - and not or and not either, so after it says I suffer not a woman to teach, thats 1, then it says nor, which means and not, which by saying that is adding another reason or clause to that which is being addressed which makes 2. Telling them to be in silence makes the 3rd thing he addressed. When you usurp authority, you take the place of or seize and take control without authority and possibly with force; take as one's right or possession. So when a woman is teaching the bible, she is taking the place of a man because unto man was committed the oracles of the Most High. So by a woman teaching the bible, she is taking the position of leadership that was given unto a man whether she is teaching men or women.
Question: Who were the oracles of the Most High committed unto?
1 Peter 4:10 - As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.
FYI: In 1 Corinthians 1:12 we learn that there is one body, and that the body has many members. So that means women are apart of the body, for any man to teach otherwise is completely ignorant. Spiritual gifts are given unto the members of the body, and with women being members also, that means that they too receive spiritual gifts, and all the gifts are of the same Spirit because by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body. Women in the bible had the gift of speaking in tongues, they had the gift of wisdom, they had the gift of prophesying, they had the gift of discernment, no man can deny that. But what is not seen in the bible, is women having the gift of laying on hands and healing people, teaching the gospel, baptizing, or teaching the gospel to other women, but you find men doing these things. Which this goes to show there are differences in administrations as 1 Corinthians 12:5 says, but all still are of the same Lord. So the members of the body are not all going to have the same role and gift, but that doesn't make them any less because they all serve one body, which is Christ. So every man should use the gift given unto him by the Most High, to serve others, to the profit of his neighbor. Thus showing that whatever gift we have received it didn't come of our own selves, but instead came from the Most High, for us to be stewards. So we are to employ our gifts for the common good of others, as good stewards of the manifold grace of the Most High, with the talents wherewith his free love has in-trusted us.
1 Peter 4:11 - If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do it as of the ability which God giveth: that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
FYI: Where in the precept did it say if any man speak, let her speak as the oracles of the Most High? Nowhere, which is how we know the phrase "any man", is in literal reference to men because a woman cannot be a him. So if any man minister, which is in reference to the administration of gifts in which Christ left before he ascended upon high. How do we know that? Ephesians 4:8 - Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men. So before Christ went back into the heavens to be with the Father, he gave gifts unto men, which is why in 1 Peter 4:10 it said - As every man hath received the gift, even so minister, because these gifts where given unto men. So the question that one needs to ask is, what gifts where given unto me by Christ? Ephesians 4:11 - And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; The gifts Christ gave unto men, where the office of Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors, and Teachers. So you see, he didn't give the office or gift for a Stewardess or Deaconess, that teaching is not biblical it was added unto the scriptures to further appease women rights and position in religious institutions, which that was done by those operating in the Jezebel spirit which is after Satan.
FYI: So if any man speak, is should be through a gift of the Spirit which is not after his own words, but they are commanded to be speakers of the Most High's divine message. If any minister, let him do it as of the ability which the Most High giveth, meaning let him act as one of the Most High's ministers and act in his strength, since all is of the Most High. So in a man's whole conversation, whether public or private, all his words must be according to this pattern, both as to matter and manner, more especially in public. So therefore, by this mark we may always know who are the true or false prophets. The oracles of the Most High teach that men should repent, believe, and obey. He that treats of faith and leaves out repentance, or does not enjoin practical holiness and righteousness to believers, does not speak as the oracles of the Most High, and he does not preach Christ. So let him think as highly of himself as he will, but if any man minister, let him serve his brother in love, whether in spirituals or temporals. Let him minister as of the ability which the Most High giveth, in which that is, humbly and diligently, meekness, long suffering ascribing all his power to the Most High, and using it with his might. See people don't get it broken down like this in these religious institutions, which is why when they read the teachings of Paul, they find issues with them. So now after seeing the position and leadership and gifts that were given unto men, now lets go back and examine something else in 1 Timothy 2 that people tend to overlook or just miss. By now you should fully know that Christ himself revealed unto the Apostle Paul the things in which he taught, because in Acts 26:16 he we learned that Christ said Paul would be a minister and a witness of the things which he has seen, and the things in which he would reveal unto him.
Question: So now knowing, some might still wonder why should the people know this by now?
1 Timothy 2:12 - But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
Question: Why?
1 Timothy 2:13 - For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1 Timothy 2:14 - And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
FYI: So this is why one should be fully persuaded by now that Christ himself revealed unto the Apostle things by way of revelations. How so you might ask in regards to this, because how could Paul know Adam was formed before Eve and Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression, if he wasn't born then? Where was this direct teaching written at in the old covenant? Nowhere, Christ revealed this unto Apostle Paul just as the Most High revealed unto Moses what happen in the garden of Eden and with Abraham and Issac and Jacob, because Moses was not yet born then either. By way of revelations, the Most High revealed it unto him just as Christ did with the Apostle Paul. So if its something you don't understand in regards to the Apostle Paul's teachings, then wait on the spirit to give you understanding or guide you to a servant of the Most High who is in the position to give understanding. Don't speak too quickly just because what you read is not in agreement with your flesh and own experience and personality, let it dissolve then pray and fast and you'll get an answer. Now brothers also say that women are called to proclaim the gospel to the lost, and the scriptures they use is what I shall go over now. The first one they use to teach such damnable doctrine, is Matthew 28, so lets get it.
Question: What does Matthew 28 say in regards to women proclaiming the gospel to the lost?
Matthew 28:18 - And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:19 - Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Matthew 28:20 - Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
FYI: These are the scriptures they use to support their claim of women can teach the lost. But yet you reading here for yourself, and nowhere does it make mention of women teaching period. It said Christ spake unto them, so the question should be who is them, and did that them consist of women? Cause if so, then brothers teaching just might be true. Matthew 28:16 - Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. Then the eleven disciples, and we already know the disciples were hand chosen by Christ just like he chose Apostle Paul, and in selecting the disciples, Christ chose all men. So Christ is talking to all men here when he is telling them to teach. Now another precept they try to use, is Acts 1:8, so lets get that one also.
Question: Whats written of in regards to women teaching in Acts 1:8?
Acts 1:8 - But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
FYI: So he is recalling that which Christ spoke, in which he said ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem and in all Judea and in Samaria and unto the uttermost part of the earth. So this would support the brothers claim, if it identified who Christ was relying this message unto. So the question is, who was Christ speaking to? Acts 1:2 - Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen: Again we see the same thing we seen in Matthew 28, Christ was speaking to the disciples whom he had chosen which were all men. Ok the last one that brothers try to use to support keeping their bed warm at night, cause that's the only reason a man can teach a woman such damnable doctrine, is to stay in good graces with sisters in hopes of staying in their panties. So they confuse them with a little truth that is a bold face lie, does that make sense? You might be like that's crazy its confusing, in which I totally agree it is, and that's why brothers teach such doctrine, which in all honesty is male chauvinistic. How so, because they teach a woman that she cannot be in a religious institution teaching the bible, nor can she teach men, but yet say she can teach other women and her kids despite nowhere in the bible, does it ever show a woman teaching her kids or other women the bible. The job was given unto the father/husband, and if the woman didn't have a husband, she sought out a Elder to teach her and her kids, this them hypocrites don't tell women. This they won't tell women, but I will cause I don't need their panties or their money or their exaltation as some spiritual figure, I got my own wife I don't have multiple wives so I don't need to tell and teach multiple lies. (To whomever, take it how it hit you!)
Question: What other precept do they try to use and deceive the women with?
Titus 2:3 - The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;
FYI: See the first thing people must understand when reading this, is that the Apostle Paul was instructing Titus, who was a minister on how he ought to teach the people. How do we know this? Titus 1:4 - To Titus, mine own son after the common faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ our Saviour. So he is telling Titus to speak thou the things which become sound doctrine, then instructed him to teach aged men to be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, and in patience. Then he comes back and says aged women likewise, meaning also teach aged women, in which aged is in reference to older women or more experience someone like elder mother type figure. So the Apostle Paul says teach them to become teachers of good things, in which we know this is not in reference to a woman teaching bible, because in 1 Timothy 2:12 he said I suffer not a woman to teach. So that alone should make brothers say, ok, then what shall they teach?
Question: What shall he teach the aged women to teach?
Titus 2:4 - That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
FYI: LIE EXPOSED, LIE EXPOSED, LIE EXPOSED! After the Apostle Paul lets Titus know to teach the aged women how to become teachers of good things, he continues over and lets him know those good things that they are to teach. In which nowhere did he say the gospel, he said that they may teach the young women, to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, in which in doing so they teach good things, because doing so keeps the word of the Most High from being blasphemed. This simple, this is not talking about a woman can teach the bible, folks you need to get you some spiritual intelligence, in which in this case, just common sense. People are doing exactly what Peter said they do, which is create their own interpretation of what they think the precept should mean, and corrupting people with damnable doctrine. Also, another precept they use lets get it.
Revelation 2:20 - Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.
FYI: Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee. So whats the beef Christ is speaking of? Is because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, 1 to teach, 2 and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, 3 and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. 3 things he named, now if a woman can teach, why does Christ have that against us in regards to Jezebel? Because through the Apostle Paul and the prophets the order of teaching the bible was given unto men. Simple and plain, the Apostle Paul is not to blame. Shalom brothers and sisters.
